Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Meta-analysis of 13 studies with a total of 449 participants demonstrated a highly significant large increase in serum ferritin concentration after OIS (SMD = 1.27, 95% CI 0.44–2.10, p = 0.006, I 2 = 90; EXP PRE mean ± SD = 20.4 ± 10.9, EXP POST = 30.3 ± 12.4; CON PRE = 20.0 ± 10.8; CON POST = 21.5 ± 10.7) (Fig. 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, pCPA treatment of the pregnant rats compared to saline treatment produced in offspring a highly significant decrease in duration of the second phase of the response to formalin, both in female pups (flexing+shaking, p < 0.006, Fig. 2 Aa; licking p < 0.002, Fig. 2 Ba) and male pups (flexing+shaking, p < 0.02, Fig. 2 , Ab; licking, p < 0.01, Fig. 2 , Bb).
highly significantP < .0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
2-Way repeated measures ANOVA (group(2) × time(3)) showed highly significant difference in the amount and dynamics of S100B mRNA between tetanization and LFS (group effect F (1,5) = 21, P < .006; group-time interaction F (2,10) = 19, P < .001).
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
from All India Institute of Medical Sciences reported 65% patients to have an improvement of 4 or more points in NIHSS score at 48 h with alteplase.[ 9 ] We observed highly significant difference between NIHSS scores at baseline and 24 h ( P = 0.006) which is in agreement with the previously published studies on tenecteplase.[ 4 ] In the present study, 78.5% patients had an excellent recovery at 90 days with mRS score being 0 or 1, which is even better than the results of a recent RCT in which excellent recovery was observed in 54% subjects.[ 4 ] One patient (7%) in our study developed SICH and additionally, aspiration pneumonia with subsequent death.
highly significantP =0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Omega-3 PUFAs Comparative analysis of omega-3 levels PUFAs between the Fst-Tg and WT adipose tissue metabolites display highly significant increase in two key PUFAs including docosapentaenoate (n3; 22:5n3) (1.42 fold; P =0.006), and docosahexaenoate (22:6n3) (1.5 fold; P =0.03) selectively in SC adipose tissues ( Table 3 ).
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
For the VO 2 swim adjusted for a mean body mass, the effect of Sex was not significant ( F 1,567 = 0.04, P = 0.87), but line Type × Sex interaction was highly significant (F 1,525 = 7.7, P = 0.006): in A lines VO2swim was higher in females than in males (Tukey–Kramer: t 243 = 2.6, P = 0.04), whereas in C lines the difference was reversed, although not significant ( t 681 = –1.6, P = 0.36, Table. 1 ).
highly significantP=0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In the CLL group, no statistical significance was found regarding all markers except for CD20 mean fluorescence intensity (P=0.002), however, within the NHL group, there was a significant relation between the percent positivity of both flow cytometry and IHC regarding CD20 (P=0.01), CD5 (P=0.02), CD23 (P=0.049), κ (P=0.025) and highly significant one for λ (P=0.006) ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp -values ≤ 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
a trend towards significancep -values ≤ 0.051.0× alpha
As regards quantitative traits, the rs4846914_G allele was significantly associated with increased levels of BMI and weight (with Bonferroni-corrected p -values < 0.003), increased levels of ApoC1 (with highly significant p -values ≤ 0.006), higher levels of ANGPTL3 (at p -values with a trend towards significance, and lower levels of HDL (at p -values ≤ 0.05) ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0060.1× alpha
A retrospective study testing the efficacy of corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy to surgery (142 patients with adjuvant corticosteroids and 56 patients without adjuvant corticosteroids) showed a trend toward a survival benefit with medical treatment (risk of death three-fold less in the case of adjuvant corticosteroids ( p = 0.006)) [ 24 ].
marginally significantp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
In this age group, we noticed suggestive causal association between BMI with increased risk of DM (OR = 1.217, 95% CI 1.020-1.452, p = 0.029), and lower fasting glucose (OR = 0.963, 95% CI 0.936-0.991, p = 0.009), as well as marginally significant association with fasting insulin (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.872-0.977, p = 0.006) in females, not in males.