Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

nominally significantP = 6.0 × 10 −30.1× alphagold
The SECA primary test for the overlap of associated effects, including all 144 SNP subsets, revealed more subsets than expected by chance showing at least nominally significant pleiotropy between endometriosis and endometrial cancer ( P = 6.0 × 10 −3 ): The pair of SNP subsets producing the minimum exact binomial test P ‐value for pleiotropy (endometriosis SNP subset with P ≤ 0.002 and endometrial cancer SNP subset with P ≤ 0.86) had P = 3.3 × 10 −4 .
a decreasing trendp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the SCDM-DHM group and the control group ( p > 0.05), with no statistically significant differences observed in terms of maternal age, birth weight, gestational age, number of males, delivery mode, SGA status, or length of hospital stay; a decreasing trend in the number of single births was observed in the SCDM-DHM group ( p = 0.006).
highly significantP =0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Omega-3 PUFAs Comparative analysis of omega-3 levels PUFAs between the Fst-Tg and WT adipose tissue metabolites display highly significant increase in two key PUFAs including docosapentaenoate (n3; 22:5n3) (1.42 fold; P =0.006), and docosahexaenoate (22:6n3) (1.5 fold; P =0.03) selectively in SC adipose tissues ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, there were no significant main effects of SEQUENCE [ F (1, 17) = 0.41, p = 0.531] or HEMISPHERE [ F (1, 17) = 0.08, p = 0.783]; however, the N100m activity was much larger in the hemisphere contralateral to the ear of entry, as revealed by a highly significant main effect of EAR OF ENTRY [ F (2, 34) = 7.16, p = 0.006 ** ] and a highly significant HEMISPHERE * EAR OF ENTRY interaction [ F (2, 34) = 27.18, p < 0.001 *** ].
marginally significantp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
The linear regression model explained 54.4% of the variance of ECAS‐Language scores ( F (19, 219) = 13.77; p < 0.001), with only the ECAS‐Executive positively predicting them at α adjusted = 0.0028 ( β = 0.46; t (219) = 5.97; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.07), and a similar, although marginally significant, effect being found for ECAS‐Visuo‐spatial ( β = 0.15; t (219) = 2.78; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.02).
moderately significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation between SE and measurement accuracy A correlation analysis between SE before each test and the measurement accuracy of the goniometric task of each test in the SC group revealed that SE before the STRT had a moderately significant negative correlation with the measurement accuracy of the STRT (ρ= -0.675, p = 0.006) (Fig. 5 a).