Excerpts

This most likely reflects anticipation mediated sampling bias with a highly significant inverse correlation between age at sampling and modal CTG repeat length ( r = −0.528, p = 0.006).

Testing the relation between the level of standardisation and inter-rater reliability in all 23 studies showed a highly significant association (P=0.006).

However, there was a highly significant 31.5% increase in NgR expression between schizophrenia and control subjects (F 1,29 =8.900; P =0.006; Figure 1c ) in the CA3.

They indicated a highly significant enhancement of performance for the symbolic group, t (51) = 3.33; p = .006, η 2 = 0.178, but not for the non-symbolic, t (51) = 0.45; ns, η 2 = 0.005, or control, t (51) = 0.23; ns, η 2 = 0.001, groups.

Although with lower absolute stroke hospitalization rates, those aged <65 years were the only ones with an increasing trend ( Table 1 , Fig. 2 , and Supplementary Fig. 3 A ), resulting in overall decreasing age inequalities as the SII became closer to 0 (AAPC −3.6%, P = 0.006) ( Table 3 ).

Our second test excluded these poorly sampled countries (i.e., those with fewer than three populations screened) and indicated a highly significant relationship ( n = 23; μ: r = 0.31, P = 0.006).

The dark:light activity ratio was reduced (LMM, p=0.024) in Off6-cycle, and there was a marginally significant circatidal (10–14 hr) component (LSP, p=0.006).

Interestingly, a highly significant and strong correlation between TA and the amount of new bone was solely found in STE sites ( r = 0.794, P = 0.006), indicating that a reliable and predictable relation between the scaffold volume and the amount of newly formed bone existed in test sites only.

However, The main effect of distractor type was found highly significant, F 1 (2,100) = 5.4, p = .006, η 2 p = .09; F 2 (2,158) = 4.17, p = .01, showing participants were significantly slower at launching a saccade towards the target in the referent competitor condition (551.59 ms, SE = 12.9) and the translation cohort competitor condition (552.16ms, SE = 13.2) than in the condition when the target was accompanied by unrelated distractors (533.14ms, SE = 13.2)(See S1 Dataset ).

Bleeding index No statistically significant difference in the mean values of the gingival index was found between the test and control groups at baseline ( P = 0.811), but a highly significant difference was observed at 15 days ( P = 0.006), 45 days ( P = 0.000), and at 90 days ( P = 0.000) [ Table 2 ].

A marginally significant correlation was observed in the inferior parietal areas (r = - 0.053, p = 0.006).

Stratified analyses showed that the association between urinary BPA levels and PCa is highly significant ( p = 0.006) among the 30 patients <65 years old (mean and median age = 58, minimum age = 46) but that this association does not reach significance among the half of patients >65 years ( Fig. 1 ).

As regards quantitative traits, the rs4846914_G allele was significantly associated with increased levels of BMI and weight (with Bonferroni-corrected p -values < 0.003), increased levels of ApoC1 (with highly significant p -values ≤ 0.006), higher levels of ANGPTL3 (at p -values with a trend towards significance, and lower levels of HDL (at p -values ≤ 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Prior to the pandemic, there was an increasing trend in the utilization of LPV (absolute increase of 0.8% per quarter; 95% CI 0.3–1.4%; p = 0.006, Fig. 1 ).

30.67 ± 3.59 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.073); overall, in the group treated with Dapa, the diminution of BMI was highly significant (32.04 ± 4.49 vs. 31.40 ± 4.18 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.006); in patients treated on Empa 10 mg+metformin, the reduction in BMI was significant (34.64 ± 5.80 vs. 33.14 ± 5.70 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.002); in patients treated with Empa 25 mg+metformin, the decrease in BMI was insignificant (33.45 ± 3.82 vs. 33.22 ± 3.84 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.421); overall in the group treated on Empa, the decrease in BMI was significant (34.16 ± 5.08 vs. 33.17 ± 4.99 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.002) ( Figure 4 ).

This overlap is highly significant based on a permutation test ( P = 0.006; see Methods).

The study also found a stark decrease in the absolute count of CD8 lymphocytes, with a highly significant P -value of less than 0.0001, as well as a decrease in the absolute count of CD19 lymphocytes ( P = 0.006).

In addition, Diagnosis by Genotype interaction on lambda was highly significant ( F = 8.14, df = 1,62, p = 0.006), and there was a trend for Diagnosis to influence lambda (anxious: lambda mean = 1.3 SD = 1.02; healthy: lambda mean = 1.5, SD = 0.59; F = 3.15, df = 1,62, p = 0.08).

Nominally significant responder by genotype effects ( Figure 2 ) were noted for the dopamine receptors DRD1 rs5326 ( P =0.006, Figure 2a ) and rs4867798 ( P <0.05, Figure 2b ), DRD3 ser9gly rs6280 ( P <0.05, Figure 2c ) and DRD4 rs11246226 ( P <0.04, Figure 2d ); the adrenergic receptor ADRA2A rs1800544 ( P <0.02, Figure 2e ); the dopamine and serotonin transporters SLC6A3 VNTR ( P <0.05, Figure 2f ) and SLC6A4 STin2 VNTR ( P <0.05, Figure 2g ), respectively; and the catabolic enzyme COMT val/met rs4680 ( P <0.05, Figure 2h ).

Furthermore, a highly significant interaction between rearing regime and nesting status was revealed ( P = 0.006), with high levels of gene expression among non-nesting, flow-reared fish leading to smaller differences in gene expression between nesting and non-nesting fish reared in flowing water than for fish reared in still water.

Time Window 4 (200–300 ms) A highly significant interaction of the factors ROI and Speech act was found [F(6,84) = 4.137, p = 0.006 (Huynh–Feldt corr.)].

Oropharyngeal Secretion Accumulation Scale (Murray Score) Change: The most pronounced heterogeneity was observed in Murray score changes, with highly significant interaction test ( p = 0.006).

fluminea (Independent-samples Test, F = 0.239, P = 0.022) and a highly significant difference in the medium size (Independent-samples Test, F = 1.512, P = 0.006).

The TLICS scores of injury morphology and PLC integrity were significant different between patients who received non-operative or operative management by all six radiologists during the first and second reviews ( p < 0.000), except for the injury morphology score during the second review by one radiologist with borderline significance ( p = 0.006).

At the same time, for product yield (Y 2 ), both quadratic effects (X 1 2 and X 2 2 ) are highly significant ( p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively), demonstrating a complex nonlinear response with an optimum.