Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Random intercept for Participant was significant [β = 1.728, SE = 0.086, 95% CI = [1.56, 1.90], t (47.99) = 20.117, p < 0.001] and fixed-effects factor WordOrder was highly significant [β = −0.098, SE = 0.035, 95% CI = [−0.17, −0.03], t (808.19) = −2.78, p = 0.006].
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
5k ) as compared to their counterpart mice bearing the fecal microbiota from HFHS-C donors, which was highly significant (post-hoc analysis: p = 0.006) at the 15 min peak of insulin secretion), and further illustrated by calculation of the GSIS during the peak of insulin response (Fig. 5l ). 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the gut microbiota composition revealed that FMT-HFHS-PM mice had greater alpha diversity than FMT-HFHS-C mice, represented by Shannon and Simpson’s reciprocal indices, consistent with data from donor mice (Fig. 3f, g and 5m–n ).
highly significantP = 0.00600.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The association between sedentary behavior and elevated TyG-WC was highly significant in both the low activity group (β = 2.0217, 95 % CI [0.5801 to 3.4634], P = 0.0060) and high activity group (β = 3.8573, 95 % CI [2.3018 to 5.4128], P < 0.0001), but not significant in the middle activity group (β = 1.2830, 95 % CI [−0.1006 to 2.6666], P = 0.0692).
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
30.67 ± 3.59 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.073); overall, in the group treated with Dapa, the diminution of BMI was highly significant (32.04 ± 4.49 vs. 31.40 ± 4.18 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.006); in patients treated on Empa 10 mg+metformin, the reduction in BMI was significant (34.64 ± 5.80 vs. 33.14 ± 5.70 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.002); in patients treated with Empa 25 mg+metformin, the decrease in BMI was insignificant (33.45 ± 3.82 vs. 33.22 ± 3.84 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.421); overall in the group treated on Empa, the decrease in BMI was significant (34.16 ± 5.08 vs. 33.17 ± 4.99 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.002) ( Figure 4 ).
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed no differences between patients and controls in the brightness induction test ( t 39.8 = 0.534, p = 0.60, d = 0.115; Figure 2A ), but we did observe a highly significant difference between groups in the contrast suppression test ( t 35.2 = 2.902, p = 0.006, d = 0.663; Figure 2B ).
showed a trendP = 0.0060.1× alpha
Adding interaction terms for interferon plus lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon plus ribavirin, and lopinavir/ritonavir plus ribavirin in the Cox‐PH regression analysis showed a trend toward synergy between interferons and ribavirin in the full dataset (AHR = 6.04, P = 0.006; Figure 3 ), as well as in the additional analysis taking in quality assessments to account for potential bias: respiratory data limited to drug quality and in data limited to only viral load quality 1 data ( Figure S4 , Figure S5 ).
a strong trendp < 0.0060.1× alphagold
The primacy/recency ratio increased in parallel with omnibus scores [ r = 0.25, t (189) = 3.55, p < 0.0005] and, consistent with previous results (Capitani et al., 1992 ; Golomb et al., 2008 ), showed a strong trend toward decline with increasing age [ r = −0.20, t (189) = −2.81, p < 0.006].
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Crucially, our multivariate regression model demonstrated that a composite favorable response—defined by concurrent achievement of QRS narrowing ≥20 ms, LVESV reduction ≥15%, and LVEF improvement ≥10% at 6–12 months—was a highly significant predictor of event-free survival (Overall model p = 0.006).