Excerpts

angustirostris abundance showed a positive trend (GLM: t = 2.79, p = 0.006).

Most variables were not significant predictors of early RTS, except for the RASS approach, which showed a trend towards significance (estimate: 1.102, p = 0.006).

However, a highly significant association was observed between dental caries and dental visits (P=0.006), with 17.8% (n=43) of caries patients visiting the dentist compared to 91.8% (n=146) of those without caries.

However, for factor score 2, main dependences were observed for the three hormones individually (highly significant for T3: F=8.58, P =0.006), but only significant interactions with GH were detected for TP (F=8.87, P =0.006).

The control group showed a more complex pattern of RTW: A linear contrast [χ 2 (1) = 6.87, p = .009] corresponded to an increasing trend of RTW, but a quadratic contrast [χ 2 (1) = 7.48, p = .006] showed that RTW was not that stable, that is, first an increase and then a decrease of RTW.

A decreasing trend in all CCS categories was observed among patients undergoing CABG, while in the PCI group, the trend remained stable for all CCS categories until 2009, and then it showed an increasing trend for low‐risk CCSs of 1 to 2 (APC, 3.1; P =0.006).

Moreover, the interaction between self-reported history of neuropathy/nerve problems and glycemia arm continued to remain highly significant ( P = 0.006) after adjusting for age, sex, waist circumference, smoking, diabetes duration, hypoglycemic agents used, history of retinopathy, history of amputation, and systolic blood pressure.

Women with mixed symptoms had almost significant higher CGI severity than women without mixed symptoms ( p = 0.006).

The increase was consistent across all three Hoxb regions tested (supplementary Table S2 ) and the difference in modification levels between the VPA-treated and untreated Hox genes was highly significant (H4K8ac, P = 0.006, H3K4me3, P = 0.0008; this and all subsequent comparisons use Student's two-tailed paired t test).

A highly significant statistical interaction ( P =0.006) was observed between the two markers indicating that the effect of CD8 + TILs on local recurrence is modified by the negative or positive expression of RHAMM.

Additionally, a highly significant ( P =.006) reduction in total cholesterol/HDL was also noted following 12 weeks of CAPROS supplementation ( Fig. 1 ).

In GRU-1A both RA (P=0.01) and TNF-alpha (P=0.002) exhibited highly significant and dose-dependent growth inhibitory effects, which could further be increased by a combined application of both compounds (P<0.006).

Indeed, the two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant main effect of perceptual response [ F (1, 17) = 10.19, p < 0.006, η 2 p = 0.38], with greater P2 amplitude on streaming trials (streaming, 3.75 ± 0.70 μV; bouncing, 3.10 ± 0.74 μV).

A recessive logistic regression model that assumes two copies of the SNV ( aa ) are required for disease showed a highly significant association between MAVS and KS (OR, 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.9; p = 0.006).

There was highly significant increase (p=0.006) in LCEA in females (38.53°) as compared to the males (36.20°) on the left side.

We observed several complex interactions, notably suggesting an increased risk of severe neutropenia in patients carrying a homozygous variant CYP3A5 rs776746 genotype (nominally significant OR 5.58, p = 0.006) and a potential pleiotropic protective effect from NFATC2 rs6021191 (OR 0.09, p = 0.001).

Under 80% moisture, depth distribution was highly significant (F 3,6 = 154.75, p = 0.006), with pupation strongly concentrated in the shallowest layer (0–0.5 cm; 71.7 ± 3.33%) and no pupae recovered from deeper strata.

However, in the case of small elements, we observe a more or less significant correlation p = 0.006 and r = 0.64.

Second, stratifying the cohort by the clinical eGFR cut-off of 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 revealed a clear moderating effect: the GMV reduction in the CI group was not significant in patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (P=0.148) but was highly significant in those with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (P=0.006; Table S3 ).

ANOSIM confirmed highly significant intergroup differences (R = 0.6883, P = 0.006).

They indicated a highly significant enhancement of performance for the symbolic group, t (51) = 3.33; p = .006, η 2 = 0.178, but not for the non-symbolic, t (51) = 0.45; ns, η 2 = 0.005, or control, t (51) = 0.23; ns, η 2 = 0.001, groups.

5A ) ( 14 ) that exhibited an increasing trend over time (Mann-Kendall test’s P = 0.006).

Together with the essential logit transformation of qIHC scores, this approach reduced the noise of measurement as demonstrated by uncovering a highly significant, strong association between mRNA and protein expressions of S100A4 (Spearman’s coefficient ρ = 0.72 ( p = 0.006)).

The absolute difference between QFR and FFR was greater in the RCA than in the Cx ( p = 0.038) and tended to be greater in the Cx than in the LAD, but this did not reach statistical significance, whereas it was smaller in female patients ( p = 0.006) and in patients with aortic stenosis ( p = 0.033), as shown in Figure 5 c.

Construct validity The Bartlett’s test of sphericity, 9 , 24 , 25 used to verify the assumption that variances are equal across groups or samples, was highly significant ( P =0.006), indicating that the distribution of data met the psychometric criteria for exploratory factor analysis to proceed.