Differences Analysis between Two Varieties with Different Lodging Resistance There were highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the contents of calcium, potassium, silicon, crude fiber, lignin, starch, soluble sugar, and soluble protein between the lodging-resistant variety LENA and the lodging-sensitive variety QY2 ( Figure 1 ).
Excerpts
The differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.01.
The results were concluded to be statistically significant with P < 0.05 and highly significant with P < 0.01.
Statistical differences were identified between the groups, with significant results ( p < 0.05) and highly significant results ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001).
rusticana root oil and the negative control was highly significant ( p < 0.01) for doses greater than 0.025 mg/cm 2 .
Experimental mice on HFD exhibited a significant trend of weight gain compared with WT mice fed on ND and HFD ( p < 0.01, ApoE −/− /HFD vs.
In this study, the four tested MTB antigens were immunogenic in our cohort as evidenced by the highly significant differences (P < 0.01 to P < 0.0001) seen between stimulated and un-stimulated cultures.
There was also a significant trend between higher waist circumference and the odds of elevated SII (p=0.01), and PLR (p<0.0001).
Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed Bonferroni‐corrected significant area under the curve (AUC) associations for all biomarkers and re‐hospitalization, except for borderline significant MR‐proADM: NT‐proBNP (AUC 0.595, 95% CI 0.525–0.666; P = 0.010), cystatin C (AUC 0.614, 95% CI 0.542–0.687; P = 0.002), copeptin (AUC 0.599, 95% CI 0.530–0.668; P = 0.007), MR‐proADM (AUC 0.597, 95% CI 0.524–0.669; P = 0.011), and CT‐pro‐ET‐1 (AUC 0.606, 95% CI 0.537–0.675; P = 0.004).
With the lowest p value, 8 × MICs (Trial 5), and incubation was found highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect regarding inhibition of S. aureus and S. enterica ( Table 6 ).
Correlations of just upper extremity UPDRS bradykinesia scores (items 23–25, maximum score = 24) with hand speeds were not as highly significant (Spearman Rank Order Correlation, Correlation Coefficient = − 0.5 and − 0.588, P < 0.01 for each task).
Testing the mean sensitivity and PPV across datasets of each species for significance, we find that classification results are always highly significant ( p < 0.01, for group level permutation testing against classification performance for Markov chain simulations, see Methods: Statistical Analysis), with mean ± STD sensitivity in the model: 0.99, rat: 0.73 ± 0.07, or human: 0.45 ± 0.15, and PPV in the model: 0.99, rat: 0.79 ± 0.16, or human: 0.56 ± 0.10.
Nominally significant associations ( p < 0.01) were detected for several variants in genes encoding vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 ( VIPR2 ), period circadian regulator 2 ( PER2 ), casein kinase 1 epsilon ( CSNK1E ), and activator of transcription and developmental regulator ( AUTS2 ), but no signal survived correction for multiple testing.
Differences were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.
(The forest plot, leave-one-out plot, sensitivity forest analysis plot, funnel plot, scatter plot for all positive results are available in the Supplementary Material.) Among the 29 metabolic traits significantly associated with glioma susceptibility, 5 metabolic traits showed a highly significant relationship with glioma susceptibility (p < 0.01, Fig. 2 , Table S1).
Additionally, leaf pigments display highly significant positive correlations (0.847 < R < 0.958, p < 0.01).
The difference with supermarket is highly significant ( p < 0.01).
In Model 2, the one degree terms A, B and C had extremely significant effects on the PDI (Y 2 ) of the AAP-NPs ( p < 0.01), and the F -values revealed that the contributions of the factors in this experiment were A > B > C.
When comparing the pre‐ and post‐assessment scores of the participants in Group 1, a statistically highly significant difference was found ( p < 0.01).
There were 29 pairwise F ST values (BJ-FR, BJ-QHD, BJ-XC, BJ-HS, BJ-CT, BJ-GZL, BJ-DH, BJ-HRB, TJ-CC, XTS-CC, XTS-HRB, RF-XC, FR-HS, FR-CT, FR-GZL, FR-CC, FR-HRB, XL-CC, QHD-XC, QHD-HS, QHD-CT, QHD-HRB, XC-CT, XC-DH, XC-HRB, HS-CT, HS-HRB, CT-HRB, and TL-CC) showing significant differences ( P < 0.05), 5 of which (BJ-CT, BJ-HRB, FR-CC, FR-HRB, and XC-HRB) showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).
Risk-Of-Platinum-Resistance After initial analysis of correlations to resistance to platinum-compounds, 11 highly significant (p<0.01, **) (KLRC1, TCF7, CD274, HSD11B1, COLEC12, PDGFC, FCF1, BMI1, TNFRSF9, ATG10, EWSR1ʺ) and further 23 significant candidate-genes (p<0.05, *) could be identified.
The data were evaluated by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Student’s t -test at a significance level of p < 0.05 (*) or extremely significant level of p < 0.01 (**).
Linear regressions of LM versus ultrasound ( D U1 , D U2 , D U3 and W U ) measurements were highly significant ( p < 0.01; Figure 3 ); with D U3 showing the strongest relationship as would be expected given the pair‐wise comparisons earlier ( y = 2.94 x – 27.10, adj.
It was found that there was a mostly positive but weakly significant relationship between digital game addiction and children’s eating behaviors ( P <.01; P <.05) and a highly significant relationship was found between the sleep disorder scale sleep hyperhidrosis sub-dimension ( P <.05).
The differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.