This resulted in an increase of the tumor-to-organ ratios (Table 1 ), which was found to be highly significant for heart, lung, liver, kidney, and muscle ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
** = Statistically highly significant difference ( p < 0.01). # = Non-significant difference ( p > 0.05) R esults The present study was carried out to compare the bond strength of different luting cements used for cementation of SSB over the SSCs and ZCs.
The differences were considered significant for * P <0.05 and highly significant for ** P <0.01.
Differences were considered significant at p <0.05 level and extremely significant at p <0.01 level. 3.
In addition, drought type, precipitation, and temperature had extremely significant partial correlations with the drought response of GY ( P ≤ 0.01), with partial correlation coefficients of −0.60, 0.57, and −0.44, respectively ( Figure 3B ).
Its treatment against the control showed a highly significant (p<0.01) difference with adjusted p-value (p adj) of (0.0000004)***). 3.5.1 Pathogenicity variation and treatment comparisons The treatment GD 2 B isolates showed a significant increase of 44.433 units with a t-value; (5.059787) and a p-value of 0.0003237 compared to the control.
PA males had increased an expression of hepatic LDL receptor–related proteins LRP1 and LRP5 , mediating uptake of chylomicron remnants [ 23 ], and a strong trend toward the decreased expression of NPC1 (q = 0.06; p < 0.01), which is involved in removal and trafficking of cholesterol from late endosomes to other organelles.
In addition, there were highly significant differences in each treatment group ( p < 0.01).
For fungi, the core genera exhibited highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with pH, humidity, and lactic acid.
The effect of additives on the in vitro DM digestibility of Stylosanthes silage for 48 h was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
A highly significant negative correlation ( P < 0.01) was found with CHPT1 gene, and the correlation coefficient was −0.928; the correlation analysis of each gene showed that CHPT1 gene showed a highly significant negative correlation with all genes, while all other genes showed a strong positive correlation with each other.
The clinical results for both cohorts were almost identical with highly significant improvements for all scores ( P < .01), as shown in Table 3 and Figure 4 .
The test for heterogeneity was highly significant, with p <0.01 for both abuse types and neglect.
Statistical differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant when p < 0.01 (**).
In all analyses, differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.
The difference was considered to be significant when p was <0.05, and the difference was considered to be extremely significant when p was <0.01 ( ## p < 0.01 is vs. the control group; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are vs. model group).
When comparing fellow eye dVD to the RRD dVD, the analysis revealed a significant difference in the macula-on subgroup (p = 0.01) and a highly significant difference in the macula-off subgroup (p < 0.01).
Cutaneous allodynia symptoms experienced during the attacks (assessed by ASC-12) improved after the third and sixth administration but did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparison ( p = 0.01).
a clear trendgold
There was a clear trend by age in dental caries experience in the permanent dentitions of schoolchildren at all decay thresholds of ICDAS and was found to be highly significant ( p = 0.01) at all four decay thresholds as shown (Table 2 ).
The free phenolic content showed an extremely significant positive correlation with the DPPH • and ABTS •+ radical scavenging capacity and the FRAP (p < 0.01).
The statistical results indicated a significant difference when p < 0.05 and a highly significant difference when p < 0.01.
In addition, except for time (X 4 ), other factors were highly significant ( p -value < 0.01).
The significance test ( p > 0.05) was passed by the regions that accounted for 23.75% of the total area, while the highly significant test (( p < 0.01) was passed by the regions that accounted for 54.22% of the total area.
Except for the mid diameter and plant height traits, there were highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) between the environments and the interaction of genotype and environment.
8 D), and two key genes within the GSE80178 dataset presented highly significant differences in gene expression levels between the two groups ( P value < 0.01): HDAC3 and NOD2 .