Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
For example, in male rats of the 18,000 ppm G3P-01 group, there was a significant ( P < 0.05) reduction in serum cholesterol level, as well as a highly significant ( P < 0.01) reduction in cholesterol level in the 36,000 ppm G3P-01 group in comparison with the control group ( Table 5 ).
nominally significantP < 0.010.2× alphagold
However, we observed nominally significant interactions (all P < 0.01) between carbohydrate intake and MTNR1B- rs1387153 for FG with a 0.003 mmol/L higher FG with each additional 1% carbohydrate intake in the presence of the T allele, between sleep duration and CRY2 -rs11605924 for HDL-cholesterol with a 0.010 mmol/L higher HDL-cholesterol with each additional hour of sleep in the presence of the A allele, and between long sleep duration (≥9 h) and MTNR1B -rs1387153 for BMI with a 0.60 kg/m 2 higher BMI with long sleep duration in the presence of the T allele relative to normal sleep duration (≥7 to <9 h).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
ANCOVA showed a highly significant difference between groups for the ACE-R total (F = 233.9, p < 0.01), subdomains [orientation/attention (F = 131.2, p < 0.01), memory (F = 390.9, p < 0.01), verbal fluency (F = 103.5, p < 0.01), language (F = 62.7, p < 0.01) and visuospatial (F = 61.0, p < 0.01)] and MMSE (ACE-R) (F = 170.6, p < 0.01).
highly significantp<0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Separate analyses, using the probability of a foraging trail having loaded ants, showed that the genus-level differences in loaded and unloaded returning foragers per hour were highly significant (χ 2 1 = 7.567, p<0.01), but that the differences in loaded returning workers between species within genera were not significant (χ 2 4 = 1.257, p = 0.87).
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
An SNP marker in LCYE was detected between two Australian wheat genotypes, and a highly significant ( P < 0.01) association with a QTL on chromosome 3A in two mapping populations showed that LCYE is involved in color differences at a functional level ( Crawford and Francki, 2013 ).
moderately significantp = 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In the HF group (59 patients), PWV demonstrated a positive moderately significant correlation with creatinine ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), RDW ( r = 0.31; p = 0.02); NT-proBNP ( r = 0.28; p = 0.049), brachial SP ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), central SP ( r = 0.29; p = 0.02), and a negative moderately significant correlation with eGFR ( r = −0.40; p = 0.002) ( Figure 1 ).
highly significantp = 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, if chronic promotion and prevention are computed into a difference score such that positive scores indicate a stronger promotion focus and negative scores indicate a stronger prevention focus, the effect of the manipulation is highly significant among those who are more promotion-focused ( b = 0.45, SE = 0.18, z = 2.52, p = 0.01, 95% CI = [0.101, 0.805]), but not significant among those who are more prevention-focused ( z < 1).