Excerpts

Comparing LRF scores of both listening conditions at the end of the TCAD, a highly significant difference was observed ( p < .01), with an overall higher LRF score in the unaided condition.

The maximum area under the curve (AUC) for distinguishing between HCC and benign liver disease was 0.8625 for AFP-L3% and 0.7538 for GP73, almost significantly different from the AUC of 0.5525 for total AFP ( p < 0.01).

Values were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05, highly significant when p < 0.01 and extremely highly significant when p < 0.001. 3.

Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.

Using shotgun metagenomic sequencing, these patients’ microbiota alpha diversity showed an increasing trend ( figure 1G , online supplemental figure S3A ), while beta diversity shifted toward donor profiles (PEMANOVA, p=0.01, figure 1H ).

The level of significant differences between the means of two data sets was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

The 132 per cent volume increase in cardiomyocytes cultured in the PE medium remained highly significant ( p < 0.01) with as well as without the three cells affected by the volume underestimation. 4.3.

26 Nominally significant genes from the burden test (defined as p<0.01 to minimise noise) were included in the test.

For K trans , we defined a 256 gene signature associated with 14-week treatment response by identifying genes with a nominally significant gene expression by treatment interaction term (p<0.01).

Of interest, the variation in read counts between INTS11-KD and control was barely significant over termination sites ( Fig. 4d ; Supplementary Fig. 7d ; P ~1e−2; right box plot).

N4PB analysis revealed statistically significant differences in mean plasma GFAP and NfL, and CSF NfL levels with an increasing trend between normal controls, IPD<2 yrs to onset, sIPD, and CJD cohorts (p < 0.01).

Effects of exercise training on the swimming performance of juvenile hapuku M O 2 increased linearly with swimming speed for each of the 0.0, 0.75, and 1.5 BL s −1 ER groups (linear regressions with R 2 = 0.78, R 2 = 0.78, R 2 = 0.76, and P < 0.05 for the 0.0, 0.75, and 1.5 BL s −1 ER groups, respectively, Figure 2A ) and a highly significant effect of swimming speed on M O 2 was confirmed from the Two-Way RM ANOVA tests ( F = 136.11, P < 0.01).

Consistent with preoperative imaging, revealed the maximum lesion diameter, we observed an increasing trend in the intraoperative resection diameter of lesions among types I, II, and III ( P < 0.01).

There has been an increasing trend towards ambulatory surgery over the 7 years ( P < 0.01) ( Figure 1 ).

Furthermore, highly significant ( P < 0.01) positive correlations were found between the transcripts of two genes and salt tolerance of barley both in the field and the glasshouse (Figure 9 and Table S2 ).

A significant difference was defined as *0.01< P ≤0.05, and a highly significant difference as ** P ≤0.01.

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and considered significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.01.

These results are statistically highly significant, (P = 0.01) at the end of the follow-up assessment.

The paired-sample t -test revealed a highly significant result, t ( 168 ) = − 30.65 , p < 0.01 , with a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = − 2.35 ).

Independent t-tests revealed that the treatment exerted a highly significant positive effect on both dry weight and rhizomorph numbers ( p < 0.01).

In comparison with the control group, * means a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05), ** indicates a highly significant difference ( P < 0.01), *** indicates a very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001), and **** indicates an extremely highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001).

Significant differences were considered at p<0.05 and highly significant differences at p<0.01 .

A highly significant difference was observed between PCDD/Fs TEQ in crabs and that in sediments or feeds ( p < 0.01), and the effect size was low (Cohen’d 0.25) and large (Cohen’d 1.04), respectively.

Three levels of significance were considered prior to the presentation of the results: significant (0.01 ≤ p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and significances fulfilling the Bonferroni criterion [ p < 0.00003 (BF)] because of the high number of considered variables (1728).

Significant difference was inferred for P < 0.05 and extremely significant difference P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.