Excerpts

When comparing the maximal hamstring muscle strength mean values of both, the static stretching group Baseline/Acute phase and the Baseline/Chronic phase, one could observe an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.000) (Table 4 ).

There was a highly significant relationship (P=.000) for those diagnosed at stage IV with a hazard ratio of 8.81 (3.20-24.22) compared to those who were diagnosed at stage I.

When unpaired t-test was applied to compare the two means, it was highly significant ( p = 0.000, t = −13) with 35% showing a positive behavior and 15% showing a positive behavior for group B (experimental group) ( Graph 1 ).

In contrast, computer skills showed a highly significant relationship (p-value = 0.000), indicating that better computer skills are strongly associated with greater PU.

The control groups showed a highly significant reduction in survival when compared to patients who received capecitabine and sorafenib (12.9 ± 2.1, 7.9 ± 0.9, 4.5 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.000).

The difference is highly significant ( P = 0.000), and the ROC curve analysis identified > 0.5 metastatic lymph nodes in the right cervical lateral compartment as a diagnostic threshold (sensitivity of 54.90% and specificity of 92.55%).

At three months post treatment, the values showed a mean probing pocket depth of 4.13±0.64 mm and 3.27±0.46 mm at the control and experimental sites respectively with a ‘ t ’ value of -4.266 indicating a statistically highly significant ( P <0.000) difference.

A relationship of marginal significance between emotion to gender switch costs and the RT coefficient of variability (CV; β = −260.46521, p < 0.000) was found as well, which did not survive correction, and the overall model was significant [ R 2 = 0.12, adjusted R 2 = 0.07, F (15,75) = 2.318, p = 0.004].

[ 45 ], in the meta-analysis based on 26 RCTs (2652 women), showed a moderately significant effect of isoflavones on bone loss in estrogen-deficient women (WMD (g/cm 2 ) in LS 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.02), p < 0.000 and in TH 0.001 (95%: CI 0.00, 0.02), p < 0.01).

In addition, Spearman's rank correlation test showed a highly significant correlation between estradiol and progesterone with LH in all women ( r = 0.20, P = 0.000; r = 0.18, P = 0.000, respectively).

Multiple regression analysis- adjusted odds ratios (AORs) If ANC attendance was not initiated, women without complications and women with complications had the odds of at least 9 and 11 respectively for developing SMOs and this was highly significant (p < 0.00).

- Marginal Bone Loss The random-effect model showed highly significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2=97.9%; p =0.00).

The hypothesis test demonstrated a highly significant relationship between awareness of consequences and attitude (H4) ( t = 8.164, p = 0).

Specifically, the pooled SMD indicated a highly significant increase in iron in the PUT (SMD = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.84, p = 0.00, I 2 = 87.24%, k = 8, n = 208) ( Figure 3 ), nearly high increases in the GP (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.52, p = 0.03, I 2 = 88.88%, k = 6, n = 155) ( Figure 4 ), and moderate increases in the CN (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.39 to 1.06, p = 0.00, I 2 = 47.22%, k = 6, n = 152) ( Figure 5 ).

This difference in CES-D scores between men who reported non-fatal suicidal behaviour and those who did not was highly significant ( p < .000).

As it is shown in Table 2 , there was a statistically highly significant difference among the 3 groups concerning overall lesions as determined by one-way ANOVA ( P = 0.000).

Subsequently, the education level of traditional pig farmers was found to be a highly significant risk factor for STH worm infection among traditional pig farmers in Bali (OR: 7.579; 95% CI: 2.621-21.915; p=0.00) ( Table-3 ).

The differences among the three periods always were highly significant ( p = 0.000 in the log-linear model).

The AIDA total score differed highly significant ( p = 0.000) between the patient sample and the students with a large effect size ( d = 1.02).

RESULTS Table 1 depicts a statistically highly significant reduction in GI, PI, and PPD with P < 0.000 in all the parameters in all the groups.

Risk score The risk score calculated according to the method described above had a mode of 0, a median of 1, a mean of 1.21, and a maximum of 8 for all 1672 persons and correlated highly significant and negative (Spearman correlation 0.41 p < 0.000) with the BMI.

The subjects presented with a 34% increase in STM score after the exercise program, while control subjects with a 17% lower score after exercise.[ 30 ] Association between an increase in right hippocampal volume and improved performance of the Rey Memory Test (rho < 0.23; P < 0.10) was borderline significant.[ 33 ] Resistance programs on functional ability exhibited significant time effects (F (2, 7.791) =32.638; P = .000) in the GAF, with an improvement in scores over time.

One-way ANOVA result indicated that temperature was highly significant at ( P = .000).

No significant difference was observed between Group 1b and Group 1c ( P > 0.05), whereas highly significant POBS values were observed between Group 2b and Group 2c ( P = 0.000).

The association between the frequency of use and the level of satisfaction is highly significant ( p = 0.000).