These improvements were further supported by statistical comparison using DeLong’s test, which confirmed that the observed differences in AUC were highly significant (all p values < 0.0001).
Excerpts
When the repeat number added to the expanded allele in each organ from multiple animals was averaged, the effect of the loss of one or both Mlh3 alleles was found to be highly significant for all organs ( Fig 1B ; p < 0.0001).
Quantitation of total tube length showed a highly significant and robust increase above that of controls going from 1.46 ± 0.5 mm in untreated cells to 5.46 ± 1.4 mm in Dsi2‐treated cells ( P < 0.0001; Figure 3 A), representing nearly a three fold increase.
All correlations are highly significant (p<0,0001***, Spearman).
The overall F-test from ANODIS was highly significant (P < 0.0001, Table 2 ).
Compared with the groups of healthy people, the abundance of Firmicutes showed a highly significant upward trend in the groups of UF patients ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2B ).
Indeed, patients with a high LSC17 score were less likely to achieve MRD-negative remission regardless of the treatment regimen received, although this did not reach statistical significance in the smaller group of patients treated with FLAG-Ida ( Online Supplementary Table S5 ; 30/52 [58%] vs . 54/59 [92%]; P <0.0001 for 7+3; 8/18 [44%] vs . 9/11 [82%]; P =0.06 for FLAG-Ida).
The interaction between ROI and model type was highly significant ( F (5,45) = 49.364, p < 0.0001).
Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant 8-fold enrichment of chalcones compared to the total library (17.2% vs. 2.1%, χ 2 = 34.6, df = 1, p < 0.0001), whereas phenolic compounds (χ 2 = 3.5, df = 1, p = 0.0627) and alkaloids (χ 2 = 0.009, df = 1, p = 0.9257) did not show significant enrichment (Fig. 2C and. 5 D). 3.3.
The results in Table 7 demonstrate a highly significant difference among algorithms ( P <0.0001), substantiating the robustness of bDTOPRS in feature selection.
close to significancep = 0.0651
This was confirmed by the p values of the chi-square for the log-rank test that was not significant for the MAI (p = 0.3042), close to significance for MED (p = 0.0651), and highly significant for FA2 and PC2 (both, p < 0.0001).
Novelty facilitates memory persistence through behavioral tagging during memory reactivation and reconsolidation In Experiment 1, a highly significant linear decline of latency to retrieving all rewards was seen across 12 training sessions ( Fig. 1 B, F 1,15 = 20.81, p < 0.0001).
A highly significant association also existed between the number of circulating aPMPs and CDAI ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 g).
5C , polyphosphate concentration had a highly significant effect on surface protein concentration (P < 0.0001), which was directly reflected in the marked increase in EAI across all treatments.
extremely significantqualified
* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, very significant; *** p < 0.001, highly significant; **** p < 0.0001, extremely significant; n.s., not significant.
There was a significant heterogeneity among studies I 2 = 88.7% (95% CI: 76.3–94.6%), τ 2 = 17.32, and a highly significant Q -test ( p < 0.0001) ( 14 , 17–20 ).
Kruskal-Wallis analysis revealed a highly significant difference among the groups ( P < 0.0001).
We further noted that the expression of ICAM-1 in de-differentiated tumors, defined as those with low PMEL expression (Supplementary Table 5 ), was a highly significant prognostic factor, where low ICAM-1 expression correlated with diminished MSS ( p < 0.0001, HR 25.1, 95% CI 6.0–104.6) with median survival of 8.4 months ( n = 10) for low ICAM-1 expression compared with an estimated 128.4 months ( n = 9) for high ICAM-1 expression (Fig. 5b ).
All 3 tested strips produced highly significant increases (improvements) in both MCA and nasal volume from baseline ( P < .0001 for all 3).
The fixed effects of both sonographer and expert were highly significant for either left or right ovary (joint p<0.0001 always, Table 1 ).
The overall distribution of patients in terms of q-PCR and cytogenetics is given in table below ( Table 6 ) along with Pearson correlation ( Table 7 ) showing highly significant correlation between the two ( P <0.0001).
A repeated measures ANOVA of attractiveness ratings for covered, partially covered, and uncovered displays with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed a highly significant main effect, F (1.27, 75.04) = 23.99, p < .0001, η p 2 = .29.
There was a significant trend of increased methylation with disease grade comparing normal to CIN1 and CIN3 ( p < 0.0001).
The Mahalanobis distance obtained through pairwise comparisons among the group revealed highly significant differences (10,000 permutation rounds; P < 0.0001), ranging from 2.50 ( P. affinis and P. pseudornatus ) to 19.66 ( P. poecilus and P. obesus ).
All these parameters exhibited a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the right and left eye.