5 In our study, we found that salivary glucose values were higher among diabetics (13.96 ± 7.09) than in the controls (4.61 ± 2.58); the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Excerpts
The clustering observed was found to be highly significant, and we identified 159 unexpectedly large (at least 400 Kb; p<1e-04) clusters of divergent regions with a median size of 800 Kb ( Figure 3 ; Table S2 ).
Statistical analysis of the pre- and post-test results of the linear regression of the pennation angle and fascicle length showed an extremely significant difference between the slopes (ANCOVA p < 0.0001; d = 0.80 and p < 0.001; d = 0.47, respectively). 3.3.
A highly significant difference was observed among batches ( p < 0.0001).
Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA analysis showed an extremely significant effect of drug treatment ( F (4, 280) = 21.41, P < 0.0001) and trial effect ( F (7, 280) = 35.76, P < 0.0001).
When comparing typical anti‐MAG neuropathy patients with typical CIDP patients in univariate analysis, a highly significant difference between the proportion of patients with and without supportive and unsupportive features was confirmed ( p < 0.0001 for each of the seven features).
The difference in percentage of biotype A observed with QD fluorescence in the anterior foregut or cibarium in these two treatments was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Fisher’s exact test).
*, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, **, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and ****, P < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.
Both AI-based and human-based evaluations demonstrated highly significant reductions in root length between pre- and post-treatment measurements ( p < 0.0001).
Analysis of variance of the regression model Multiple quadratic regression on the data yielded the following model: (3) Y = 2.94 + 0.2539 A + 0.1618 B + 0.0904 C + 0.0447 AB − 0.0230 AC + 0.0473 BC − 0.2315 A 2 − 0.0812 B 2 − 0.1554 C 2 Analysis of variance ( Table 4 ) shows that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack-of-fit term ( P = 0.7481).
The difference between NK cell cytotoxicity from patients (samples were taken before therapy) and healthy donors was highly significant ( P = 0.0001).
A pair-comparison analysis (Mann–Whitney) of normal tissue (n = 47) and tumors (n = 573) revealed moderate but highly significant overexpression of LSD1 in tumor specimens ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 A, left panel).
The AFAS showed a highly significant decrease in explicit bias after the OASP (p<0.0001).
In lung adenocarcinoma, many genes such as MKI67 , ANLN, NDC80 , and EXO1 showed highly significant correlations ( P < .0001 or better) with up to 15 other PAM50 genes, suggesting that these genes are concordantly expressed (data not shown).
Despite the variations between species within both groups, there is a large average difference between them and this difference between the groups is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The mean preoperative satisfaction score was 42.88 ± 19.3, while the mean postoperative score was 84.83 ± 7.6, statistically highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001).
There is a highly significant correlation between price volatility of the resource r in the EU, σ EU r , and TradeRisk (ρ = 0.71, P < 10 −4 ) (see Fig. 2A ).
The test yielded a highly significant result ( p < 0.0001), confirming the presence of potential publication bias across the included studies ( Figure 7 ).
Nevertheless, the density of Matrin3 tags around repressed compared to control exons was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, χ 2 test).
We find that the significance of the correlation with human cases is strongly reduced, but still highly significant ( P -value <0.0001).
5 A), and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Fig. 5 B).
It is of note, however, that our results still demonstrate high mortality when the TLR3 −/− strain was infected by a high viral amount of IAV, although the difference between this group and wild-type animals is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical tests confirmed these differences, with weighted Mann–Whitney U tests showing highly significant results ( p < 0.0001) in both departments.
Results showed the most effective binary combinations against MRSA, excluding β 14 (SGEO-TET) and β 34 (SMEO-TET), while the ternary combination of VOEO, SMEO, and TET ( β 234 ) had a highly significant effect on SACI-1 ( p = 0.0001).
The two-way ANOVA test proved that differences in the frequency of apoptotic cells treated with H 2 O 2 between the tested emulsions were insignificant ( p = 0.113), while the impact of various concentrations of emulsions was highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ).