Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, repeating this analysis with every patient in the study population assigned a NF-κB score according to mutation status (which makes use of all study data) and relating this to affected bone numbers, the result was highly significant both when we included all patients (r = 0.277, p < 0.0001) and also when the two patients with A427D mutations were excluded (r = 0.244, p < 0.001) (data not shown). 3.4 Impact of mutations on UBA domain structure and dimerisation We next sought to understand the structural basis of the effects of the I424S and A427D mutants on SQSTM1's ubiquitin-binding function revealed in the pull-down assays ( Fig. 1 b), and in particular, given the close proximity of these mutations to the site affected by the previously characterised G425R mutant, whether common or distinct mechanisms are manifested.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The biodistribution analysis confirmed a highly significant uptake of the radiotracer in the ischemic region of the myocardium 2 h pCI (19.46 ± 2.26% ID/g, P < 0.0001) and 4 h pCI (9.16 ± 2.03% ID/g, P < 0.0001) compared to 5 min pCI (3.2 ± 0.67% ID/g) and the sham-operated animals (2.46 ± 0.84% ID/g, Fig. 1d ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Under semi-field experimental conditions, differences between wall type and percent mortality from time of initial application to end of observation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while no differences were seen in final mortality between the two doses ( p = 0.148).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, the pseudogenes expression showed a highly significant positive correlation between pairs of genes: HERC2P2 and SDHAP1 (R = 0.626, p < 0.0001), HERC2P2 and AURKAPS1 (R = 0.233, p < 0.0001) as well as AURKAPS1 and SDHAP1 (R = 0.328, p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, meals were significantly smaller and shorter in NG Y2R KD compared with controls ( Figure 2 , Figure 3 ); probability density functions for meal patterning readouts further illustrate highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) in average meal size and duration ( Suppl Figs. 3f and 3g ), with a trend to shorter intermeal durations, particularly in the dark phase ( Figure 3 ).