A full factorial ANOVA revealed that all four factors were highly significant in their impact on children's understanding of complex sentences ( p ≤ 0.0001).
Excerpts
The KMO was 0.91, while Bartlett’s test for sphericity yielded extremely significant results (χ 2 = 13,958.572; p < 0.0001).
The mean difference was statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001 ** ) on applying Mann–Whitney U test.
The difference was statistically extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
For ventricular weight (VW), two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of AngII treatment ( p < 0.0001), increasing VW compared to saline controls.
As demonstrated in this figure, there was a highly significant difference between the mean values of the two tested groups ( p < 0.0001).
This decrease ( Figure 2 ) was highly significant compared to WT ( p < 0.0001) and was not significantly higher than the background switching at time zero ( p > 0.9999).
A highly significant impairment of cell viability, corresponding to a 74% reduction compared to the untreated cells ( p < 0.0001), was observed in 100 μM H 2 O 2 -treated cells, in agreement with the study of Ghaffari et al.
The interaction of intervention group and time point was highly significant in a two-way mixed ANOVA model (F(2, 28) = 13.38, p < 0.0001), with significant simple main effects for both intervention group (p = 0.026) and time (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 c).
A cutoff of 8.8 for max SUVmax advocated in our previous report was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
There was a strong correlation between vertical and volume loss; this correlation was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.99 for Tetric Ceram, TEC and Gradia Direct Posterior; p = 0.0001; Fig. 4 ).
GLI1 shows a clear trend with all three tested proteins: a stronger staining of GLI1 corresponds to a stronger staining of GLI3 ( p < 0.0001), KRT16 ( p < 0.0001), and S100A7 ( p < 0.0001) proteins.
Subsequent validation revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.91; p < 0.0001) between RNA-seq and RT-qPCR results indicating a high reliability of the RNA-seq data.
Network events resulted in a highly significant positive shift in [Cl − ] i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, n = 75 network events from 16 neurons) and an acidic shift in pH i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, Figures 4A,B ).
Subsequently, ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves were drawn with all those selected parameters that showed highly significant difference ( P =0.0001) between the two groups (overlap-ILD and unmixed ILD.
This biased distribution is also highly significant (χ 2 = 21.9, df = 2, P < 0.0001) and the main source of this is the LR–LR category.
As well as copper and zinc, they had a statistically highly significant coefficient ((-0.252 and -0.268, respectively) with P < 0.0001.
It was found to remain in the center in 35 patients in whom the grooved laryngoscope blade was used as compared to only 10 patients in group G ( P < 0.0001, which is very highly significant).
Results showed a highly significant positive correlation between average promoter CpG methylation and IFNG RT-qPCR ΔCt (Spearman R = 0.67, p < 0.0001, Figure 2C ), demonstrating increased IFNG promoter methylation is associated with decreased IFNG RNA expression.
Additionally, the prognostic risk model based on this triplet effectively predicted survival outcomes for lower-grade glioma (LGG) patients, with a highly significant log-rank test result ( p < 0.0001, Fig. 6 d).
The interactions of different solutes with the type of carbon (e.g., AF or BF or CF ) and pH (e.g., BD ) populate the highly significant binary terms ( p -values < 10 –4 ) and contribute considerably to the variability in the process response.
At PN50, the resulting blood Pb 2+ levels in these animals was 22.2±0.9 μg dl −1 ( n =47) for Pb 2+ exposed rats and 0.6±0.1 μg dl −1 ( n =64) for control rats, a difference that was highly significant ( P <0.0001).
marginally non-significantP <0.0001
Correlations ranged from 19% for male desiccation lt 50 (marginally non-significant) to 54% for female lt 100 (highly significant: P <0.0001).
The RM-ANOVA test indicated a highly significant P < 0.0001, suggesting significant differences in NRS scores across different time points.
There was a highly significant relation between TOSS and FOXP3 gene polymorphism in allergic conjunctivitis patients, p = 0.0001 as displayed in Table 4 .