Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For qPCR validation, we selected genes representing different functional categories within the WGCNA red module: (1) TIMP1—the hub gene identified by machine learning; (2) HCLS1 and C5AR1—two of the five candidate genes with known immune regulatory functions; (3) THBS4 (Thrombospondin 4)—although not among the final five candidate genes, THBS4 was a highly significant DEG (log2FC = 8.36, p < 0.0001) within the red module with established roles in extracellular matrix remodeling and cardiac fibrosis ( 28 ).
an increasing trendP<0.00010.0× alphagold
Furthermore, after the introduction of ICIs, both total and cancer-related medical expenses per capita showed an increasing trend [β: $4.56K, standard error (SE): $0.27K, P<0.0001 and β: $4.54K, SE: $0.27K, P<0.0001, respectively].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the maximum seasonal concentrations differed significantly between the sites (Kruskal‒Wallis p < 0.0001) and a highly significant latitudinal trend of increasing maximum vitamin D 3 at more southern sites was observed (Mann–Kendall trend test p < 0.0001).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
The ordinary one-way ANOVA results showed an extremely significant decrease in cell viability after 48 h of incubation in contrast with the cell control ( p < 0.0001, and 0.01 < p < 0.05, α = 0.05), while an LC50 for the ELExt could not be calculated because of a very low cell mortality rate even at higher concentrations [ Figure 8 iii].
highly significantP- value of < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA of FCCCD demonstrated that the model used for CNPs green synthesis was highly significant, as was evident from the model F -value of 182.74 with a very low P- value of < 0.0001 (Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant increase in synaptic abnormalities in oocytes from BPA-exposed females (16.0% versus 52.0% of cells in placebo and BPA, respectively; χ 2 = 134.8; p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A), largely attributable to increases in two categories of abnormality: “incomplete synapsis,” in which a single chromosome pair remained unsynapsed in an otherwise normal pachytene cell (0.5% in placebo versus 11.0% in BPA; Figure 1 C), and cells with end-to-end associations between nonhomologous SCs (7.7% in placebo versus 25.6% in BPA; Figure 1 D).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant correlation between chronological age and epigenetic age for both baseline (V1) and week 12 (V2) calculated using the Hannum (V1: p < 0.0001, R = 0.74; V2: p < 0.0001, R = 0.77; Fig. 2 A) and Horvath (V1: p < 0.0001, R = 0.69; V2: p < 0.0001, R = 0.70; Fig. 2 B) clocks.