Excerpts

The mean (standard deviation) number of days from vaccination to onset of symptoms for influenza-positive subjects was 119 (21) compared with 109 (32) for influenza-negative subjects, with a significant trend for increasing risk ( P <0.0001) of a positive influenza result in the unadjusted analysis considering days elapsed since vaccination to onset of symptoms ( Table 4 ).

Among the 48 genes that were both DE and DC, there was a highly significant and positive association in the direction of DE and differential genomic coverage (FET P < 0.0001) with only four genes having higher X SR coverage but higher X ST expression.

† ANOVA results indicated that the model was highly significant, as the F value for the model was 17.58 ( p < 0.0001).

Treatment with higher dosages showed a dose-dependent recovery in the sperm count, with the human equivalent dosage showing a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in the sperm count compared to the fertility impaired group, but this number was only 16.5% of the sperm count in the healthy control group.

Under cold conditions, the analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype ( p < 0.0001), indicating that Salinas consistently exhibited higher germination than US96UC23 across all time points ( Figure 1 b).

Migration assays revealed that PRF caused a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and higher than 15-fold increase (19.3-fold for DF, 18-fold for PDL, and 17.1-fold for AB) in the number of migrated cells when compared to DMEM medium, while platelet-poor plasma (PPP) only caused a moderate 5–10-fold increase in the number of migrated cells (7.8-fold for DF, 5-fold for PDL, and 7.1-fold for AB). 3.3.

We initially compared the two genotypes including all the trials, and we observed a strong trend towards increased latency in juvenile Scn2a +/− female mice (two‐way repeated measure ANOVA on both days, F (4.177, 154.5) = 8.796, p < 0.0001 for trial effect, F (1.37) = 3.895, p = 0.056 for genotype effect and F (5.185) = 0.4196, p = 0.83 for genotype × trial interaction), but no difference in adult mice (two‐way repeated measure ANOVA on both days, F (3.460, 86.51) = 4.052, p = 0.0068 for trial effect, F (1.25) = 0.9008, p = 0.35 for genotype effect and F (5.125) = 0.51, p = 0.7693 for genotype trial interaction).

A highly significant effect for the dose variable was found (F(5, 38) = 122.5, p < 0.0001), indicating that different doses resulted in significantly different blood glucose concentrations.

A highly significant negative correlation between RUNX3 and vimentin protein was observed in these gastric cancer samples ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 8 C).

A paired t ‐test confirmed that this advantage was highly significant ( t (10) = 11.32, p < 0.0001, one‐sided; mean difference = 0.029, 95% CI [0.023, 0.035]; Cohen's d = 3.41), with the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test in full agreement ( W = 66, p = 0.0005).

solanacearum in the rhizosphere soil showed a trend of increased firstly and then decreased with the increase of soil pH (R 2 = 0.5569, P < 0.0001, Fig. 1A ).

Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant main effects for both analgesic group (F = 503.44, p < 0.0001, ****, η 2 = 0.329) and surgery type (F = 329.15, p < 0.0001, ****, η 2 = 0.430), as well as a significant interaction effect (F = 41.06, p < 0.0001, ****, η 2 = 0.215).

7B-3 , right panel, mixed ANOVA revealed no significant effect of group: F (1, 240) = 0.5557, not significant after FDR correction, but highly significant effects of time: F (15, 240) = 8.4108, P < 0.0001, and interaction between group and time: F (15, 240) = 3.1105, P = 0.0001].

Also, a log–log regression of TD on D is highly significant ( t =–10.63, 38 df, P <0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference in long-term graft survival between these two groups (log-rank test p < 0.0001); Figure 3 . 4.

The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).

On the valence dimension of DEAP, the statistical significance of the difference is relatively low ( p = 0.02>0.05, t = 2.50), while on the arousal dimension, the difference is highly significant ( p < 0.0001, t = 4.78).

For VAY, all linear effects (X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 ) and interaction terms were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with the linear term of extraction time (X 1 ) in UAE and the liquid–solid ratio (X 2 ) in WBE displaying particularly significant. 2.2.2.

The difference between these mean changes was highly significant (p < 10 −4 by resampling; Figure S3 A).

Two-way ANOVA (stress × cortical layer) revealed a highly significant difference between cortical layers [F (4, 30) = 40.23, P < 0.0001] and between the two groups [F (1, 30) = 25.59, P < 0.0001)].

In contrast, temperature and precipitation during this period revealed an increasing trend at mean rates of 0.39 ± 0.02 °C ( P < 0.0001, MK test, two-sided, n = 10,330; Fig. 1d ) and 0.51 ± 0.26 mm/day per decade ( P = 0.027, MK test, two-sided, n = 12,668; Fig. 1e ), respectively.

Linear regression of seasonal curve shape against methodological score was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.3, F = 16.9, P < 0.0001, test for normality = 0.2, P < 0.0001) confirming that the tendency to demonstrate seasonal dynamics between the different retained studies depends largely on the degree of statistical or mathematical technical Sophistication of the study.

We find that the significance of the correlation with human cases is strongly reduced, but still highly significant ( P -value <0.0001).

pneumoniae cases, males were predominant, comprising 155 (55.76%) of the cases, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

The difference between the distribution center of the two subpopulations was highly significant [ F (6, 85) = 11.246, P < 0.0001].