This analysis showed observed F ST values, although somewhat low, to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( SI Appendix , Fig.
Excerpts
Differences were considered significant at a probability level of P < 0.01 (*), very significant at P < 0.001 (**) and highly significant at P < 0.0001 (***).
Data were obtained from 45 countries spanning Europe, Asia, Australasia, Africa, North and South America (6,456,570 births), and demonstrated that there was a highly significant correlation between increasing plasma selenium concentration and reducing pre-eclampsia incidence (Pearson’s r = 0.604 p < 0.0001).
All R 2 values were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
No difference was seen between A1AR −/− mice on the HFD at 20–22 weeks compared with the standard diet at 20 weeks ( P = 0.25), whereas in wild-type mice, the HFD led to a markedly significant lower ISI compared with the standard diet ( P < 0.0001), a lower index representing decreased insulin sensitivity ( Fig. 5 ).
The average response to shifting between gluconate and Cl − -Ringer's was a highly significant reduction of the pH-gradient from 1.08 ± 0.07 ( n = 199) to 0.59 ± 0.09 ( n = 134) pH-U/500 μm ( P < 0.0001, N = 43) The range of pH-gradients in Cl − -Ringer's was 0.06–2.57 pH-U.
Furthermore, the 1745 cm −1 band (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 ]]> O stretching of esters/lipids) exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between treated and untreated bacteria, particularly for 1a and 1b, suggesting perturbations in the lipid components of the cell envelope or extracellular matrix.
Analyses of the comparison of fed sand fly counts for each treatment group resulted in a highly significant reduction ( P < 0.0001) at all post-infestation time points for those dogs treated with Advantix®.
The difference between farm B (highest reduction) and farms D and F (lowest reductions) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The apparent 10.2/7.6 mmHg difference between inpatients and outpatients was only slightly reduced to 8.0/5.1 mmHg after adjustment for baseline and remained highly significant (p < 0.0001/p < 0.0001) even after correction for cluster effects.
The final model was highly significant (p value <0.0001).
The difference between type 1/type 1-like and the other two groups was highly significant ( P <0.0001).
Although the differences between the two sample groups are small in values for the normalized counts, the differences are statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The comparison between PBS and US16 showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001), as did the comparison between PBS and US16.1 ( P < 0.0001), indicating a marked difference in pixel intensity values between these groups.
These values exhibited highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.0001 ) between automatically-generated vs. manually-generated tracks.
Furthermore, the compound induced a highly significant (P < 0.0001) antiproliferative effect at 72 vs. 96h exposure period (concentration range 31.25–250 μM in MDA-MB-231 and 15.62–125 μM in MDA-MB-468 cell line) as indicated by the significant reduction in the IC 50 values, in particular for MDA-MB-468 cells.
This difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 23.70, P < 0.0001).
Factor A is extremely significant ( p <0.0001) and the interactive item BC ( p =0.0029<0.01) shows the significant difference in the sterilization effect of sliced Larou.
The diet resulted in a highly significant reduction in 24-h urinary sodium and calcium excretion: from 201 ± 89 at baseline to 128 ± 88 mmol/d for sodium ( p < 0.0001), and from 5.67 ± 3.01 to 4.06 ± 2.46 mmol/d (p < 0.0001) for calcium, respectively.
There was a significant trend toward better OS for early-stage patients in the entire cohort and in the CCRT group (P <0.0001 and <0.036, respectively).
The difference was highly significant at P <0.0001.
As shown in Table 2 , the model was found to be highly significant (F = 246.07, p < 0.0001), indicating that the variability in the response was well explained by the fitted regression equation.
Of note, each comparison of atropine sulfate 0.01% versus vehicle and atropine sulfate 0.03% versus vehicle was nominally significant ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0023, respectively) (Fig. 3 ). s In Fast Progressor Subgroup 2 (progression − 0.75 D/year or worse at baseline, n = 225), the mean (least squares means) APR from baseline to month 24 was − 0.53 D (95% CI − 0.63, − 0.43) in the vehicle group and − 0.38 D (95% CI − 0.47, − 0.30) in the combined atropine sulfate group.
In contrast, mT alone had no significant effect on shoot regeneration rate (p = 0.89) or shoot number (p = 0.71), but showed a highly significant effect on the variables longest shoot length (p < 0.0001) and rhizogenesis percentage (p < 0.0001).
Prevalence and trend of TTIs in blood donors according to donor status The analysis of first-time donors (who comprised 23.3% of all donors) showed a decreasing trend in the prevalence of HBV ( P < 0.0001, R: -0.98), HIV ( P < 0.18, R: -0.49), HCV ( P < 0.0001, R: − 0.98) and HTLV 1/2 ( P < 0.0001, R: − 0.95) from 2010 to 2018.