In contrast, the combined CPF + GT group exhibited a highly significant surge ( p < 0.001) in mononucleated cell counts versus the CPF-administered cohort.
Excerpts
The downregulation of CISH in the unstimulated 5C clone was significant when grouping all the experiments ( p = 0.006), whereas it was highly significant for 1B1 ( p < 0.001) and 1B2 ( p < 0.001).
This sensitivity difference was highly significant (Student’s t , p < 0.001).
Several highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) relationships were detected between the absolute strength measures (Fmax and F/V) and the structural traits, however, despite such high statistical significance, in the majority of cases, the amount of variation in stem absolute strength explained by stem structure was found to be modest.
Among farms, highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were found for frequency of both T. laevis and T. tritici .
The MIT showed a significant trend of the synchronous condition in inducing a stronger drift (MIT SYNC = 0.35 ± 0.08 m, MIT ASYNC = -0.013 ± 0.12 m, Wilcoxon sign rank p< 0.001, ES = 3.4, statistical power = 1).
The results are tabulated in Table 1 and are statistically highly significant with P < 0.001.
The discern tool showed highly significant, ( p < 0.001) weak to moderate (r < 0.50) correlation between all raters except PHY and SPO ( p = 0.48) and the JAMA score was highly significantly correlated among all raters.
Results of hierarchical logistic regression Block 1 of the hierarchical logistic regression was highly significant, χ 2 (1) = 13.48, P < 0.001), showed depression was significantly associated with sexual satisfaction without controlling for any potential confounders.
However, when the RRM was used, the genetic sire variance component was highly significant ( P -values <0.001) in the FZTDU and DU6 lines, but not in the two high-fecundity lines.
Electron microscopy of 800 spinal axons (400 hypoxic, 400 normoxic, 100 axons per animal) left and right of the anterior median fissure from adult hypoxic and normoxic animals and subsequent data analysis (Sigma Plot) indicated a) absence of the Normality criterion for the data distribution ( Shapiro-Wilk Test ) and b) highly significant differences in the g-ratios as well as axon diameters between the hypoxic and normoxic group with p< 0.001 (each) using the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test and the Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks .
Among the enriched metabolic pathways, three, namely, starch and sucrose metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction, and flavonoid biosynthesis, reached a highly significant level of enrichment (P < 0.001) ( Table S6 and Figure S3 ).
This was confirmed in a frequentist analysis that showed a highly significant difference (t(22) = −6.488, p < 0.001, d = −1.353) and a Bayesian analysis that found very strong evidence for the alternative hypothesis (BF10 = 11,753.764).
The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was appropriate as indicated by a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.846 and a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity ( p < 0.001), showing two common factors with a cumulative contribution rate of 59.61% extracted.
However, by separating females into age groups and including older females aged between 50 and 65 years, a clear trend was observed, namely a markedly significant (P<0.001) decrease in HPV16 positivity to 33% among females with CIS in the oldest age group.
A history of urinary tract diseases (UTD) was another major risk factor, with 33% of RCC patients having a history of UTD, compared to only 4.5% of controls, demonstrating a highly significant association with RCC risk (p < 0.001).
close to significancep = 0.001
Multiple linear regression of the treated segments showed that only pre-injection SPECT levels – both at rest and stress – were significantly or close to significance correlated with post-injection SPECT, either at rest ( p = 0.001 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at rest and p = 0.0003 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at stress) and stress ( p = 0.076 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at rest and p = 0.041 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at stress).
All participants with PPCM demonstrated reduced LVEF (<45%) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (9 (100.0%)), whereas none of the non-PPCM group showed these findings (0 (0.0%)), with a highly significant association (χ2 = 99.99, p < 0.001).
After adjustment for age, the increase in PARP remained highly significant in the subjects with DFU ( P = 0.001).
oryzae evidenced highly significant differences in mortality of the adults (χ 2 = 165.81; df = 4; p < 0.001), with survival rates of the individuals treated with S. bocconei EOs from stems or leaves similar to the ones treated with pyrethrum ( Figure 1 A).
The trend in EPMP across CKD stages 1–4/5 of 8.62 (3.94–18.23), 6.12 (1.62–12.78), 9.21 (1.82–23.17) and 21.05 (3.1-46.47) × 10 3 /μl respectively, although not completely linear, was nonetheless highly significant (p < 0.001).
In addition, the difference between stage III–IV and stage I–II patients did not reach statistical significance after adjustment ( P = 0.001, Padj = 0.006).
As expected, there is a large and highly significant ( p << 0.001) difference in the overall level of diversity, measured as the number of ambiguous base calls, between populations experiencing these differing bottleneck severities ( Fig 3A ).
Genes TraesCS1B02G002400.1 with identity to NBS-LRR REQUIRED FOR HYPERSENSITIVE RESPONSE-ASSOCIATED CELL DEATH 1 ( NRC 1a ; AKC34064.1 ) ( Supplementary Table S1 ) represented by the marker 1BR_NRC_5A ( Table 2 ) and TraesCS1B02G007800.1 having identity with a The Transcription Initiation Factor sub-unit II ( TFIID ; EMT21817.1 ) ( Supplementary Table S1 ) represented by the SNP marker IWB64368 ( Table 2 ) had highly significant ( p < 0.001) association with QSnl07.daw-1B by way of LOD scores of 13.6 and 18.6, respectively ( Table 2 ; Figure 2 A).
The difference was statistically highly significant on the paired t-test (t = 116.99, p < 0.001), reflecting effective decongestion.