Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,635 sentences

nominally significantp = 3.57 × 10 −310.0× alphagold
The largest data freeze to date ( https://www.covid19hg.org ) does not include rs4702 within its summary statistics; however, we note an excess of nominally significant genetic variants within the FURIN cis -region ( Table S1 ; binomial test p = 3.57 × 10 −31 ) comparing individuals hospitalized from COVID-19 with the general population ( Initiative, 2020 ).
highly significantP -value = 8 × 10 − 310.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The hit SNP is in high LD with this common 2-base pair deletion (labelled as chr17:44102741:D in 1000 Genomes or as rs67759530 in dbSNP) within the probe ( r 2 = 0.91, minor allele frequency = 23%), giving rise to a highly significant association in the Illumina HT12 data set ( P -value = 8 × 10 − 31 ).
highly significantP = 8.97 × 10 31the decimal point is missing; read as 8.97e-31qualifiedgold
The correlation between the trial-by-trial change of phasic pupil dilation and that of absolute movement error for the group-averaged data was highly significant ( r = 0.64; P = 8.97 × 10 31 ; bootstrap 95% confidence interval: [0.43, 0.80]), suggesting that the phasic pupil dilation may reflect error size.
highly significantP = 9.55 × 10 -310.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Vaccination also resulted in a highly significant improvement of average daily weight gain (+ 46 g/day; P = 9.55 × 10 -31 ) and carcase weight (+ 1.25 kg; P = 4.54 × 10 -05 ) as well as a shortened fattening period (-8 days; P = 2.01 × 10 -45 ). status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2008 Aug 18; Accepted 2009 Jan 7; Collection date 2009.
highly significantp < 10 −300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
(Of note, the EMN estimation was repeated across different p value thresholds [i.e., defined as the limit of the top 0.5% p values and top 0.3%], obtaining consistent results across all thresholds, with strong highly significant correlations with the original EMN values [all r ~ 0.84, p < 10 −30 ].) Next, taking the 7718 values as data, we used a novel contrastive trajectories inference (cTI) algorithm to aggregate the DNAm data by identifying the trajectories of individuals aligned/ordered with the severity of epigenetic alterations hypothetically associated with maternal neglect.
highly significant− log( p -value) > 300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Functional enrichment analyses yielded major clusters for transcripts increased in ICD, including “collagen/extracellular matrix(ECM)”, “ECM-receptor interaction/PI3K-AKT signaling,” “inflammatory bowel disease”, and “Toll-like receptor signaling pathway.” Upstream regulator analysis revealed well-known inflammatory regulators interferon gamma (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1 beta (IL1β), and interferon alpha (IFNα) as highly significant (− log( p -value) > 30) in ICD animals relative to controls.
highly significantp < 1 x 10 −300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Discussion Our GWAS across two cohorts of smallpox vaccine recipients, totaling just over 1,600 individuals, identified a highly significant (p < 1 x 10 −30 ) association signal from a region on chromosome 5 that was linked to significant inter-individual variations in IFNα response to in vitro stimulation with vaccinia virus.
highly significantP = 1.1 × 10 −300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The negative association between the changes at ZGA and upon Snrpb/d2 overexpression is highly significant ( P = 1.1 × 10 −30 , binomial test), suggesting that higher Snrpb/d2 levels before ZGA maintain alternative exon patterns in a more pre-ZGA state, a trend that was also observed for all exons together (fig.
highly significantp = 2.36 × 10 −300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Across cell types and haplotypes, we found a positive and highly significant correlation (Pearson correlation; cell type: p = 2.36 × 10 −30 , haplotype p = 6.76 × 10 −4 , Fig. 7d ) between gene expression fold change and chromatin loop fold change, and between H3K27ac fold change and loop fold change (Pearson correlation; cell type: p = 6.6 × 10 −211 ; haplotype: p = 4.63 × 10 −5 , Fig. 7e ).