Excerpts

In terms of DISCERN scores, a highly significant difference was detected among the groups ( p < 0.001), and post-hoc Dunn testing indicated that Google Gemini 2.5 Flash differed significantly from ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-5, Deepseek-V3 and Grok 3.

A one-way ANOVA on these ratings disclosed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (2, 34) = 39.94, p <.001, η p 2 = .701].

In ferret tracheae, we found the effect of metachrony on MCT to be highly significant even when controlled for CBF and ASL ( P < 0.001, Table 2 ).

A result of p < 0.05 was considered significant (*); p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant (**); p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant (***); p < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant (****).

The ANOVA results were highly significant, F(1, 72) = 262.37, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.785, indicating a large effect size, with 78.5% of the variance in external locus of control attributable to the intervention.

Still, the random effect of level 3 (healthcare centers) showed a highly significant measure for health centers (14.62, p<0.001).

A considerable reduction in synovial fluid leucocyte count was noted (p < 0.001 total, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), with a trend towards significance in the hip (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and clear importance in the knee (p = 0.008, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

The model likelihood ratio chi-square statistic of 604.969 was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Maternal age at survey, nulliparity, and smoking during pregnancy showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), and educational attainment of ≥ 13 years also differed significantly between the two groups ( p = 0.017).

The difference was highly significant in both SM→AM and SM→MM comparisons ( p < 0.001).

4 ), which is depicted by the highly significant correlation between GPP and EVI ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.91) (Fig.

The results of the two-way ANOVA for the relative theta cycle amplitude demonstrated highly significant effects for both time ( F 4,23592 = 137.27, p < 0.001) and potentiation ( F 2,23592 = 36.91, p < 0.001) factors, as well as for their interaction ( F 8,23592 = 5.24, p < 0.001).

Ischemic heart disease approached significance ( P for interaction = 0.052), with ORs of 6.03 (95% CI: 4.36–8.36, p < 0.001) for non-ischemic and 3.98 (95% CI: 3.05–5.19, p < 0.001) for ischemic cases.

At 8 d after L5T CATX activity increased strongly and highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) in the lumbar segment (Fig. 4B ; 59% compared to sham, 90% compared to naive).

berghei –infected mice are treated with rTGF-β, there is a highly significant decrease in circulating levels of TNF-α (Fig. 5 a ; t >4.8, df = 8, P <0.001 at days 3, 7, and 10), and when mice are given anti–TGF-β antibody, serum TNF-α levels are significantly higher (day 7 after infection, control mice, mean TNF-α = 5.4 ± 0.5 ng/ml; anti–TGF-β mice, mean = 9.15 ± 0.92 ng/ml; t = 7.92, df = 7, P <0.0001).

The t-test result indicates that the difference between the beginning and the end of simulator use is highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting a systematic change between the two times.

Exposure of GT 1 -7 cells to H3 resulted in an increase in GnRH release at 1 h that became highly significant at a concentration of 1,000 nM H3 [100 ± 10.1 basal vs. 247.2 ± 8.3 (1,000 nM H3), data shown as %basal, P < 0.001 vs. serum-free medium] ( Fig. 6 ).

However, in the final 6 min of the recording, the slopes revealed a highly significant difference between the control and 4‐AP groups ( n = 5 in the control group and n = 10 in the 4‐AP group, p < 0.001).

Specifically, it demonstrated the largest and most highly significant positive predictive effect on both Social Responsibility ( β = 0.344, p < 0.001 ) and Prosocial Behavior ( β = 0.271, p < 0.001 ).

Analysis of variance revealed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) among the genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions, which indicated that there was a significant interaction effect between the genotype and the environment on the BOR.

Conversely, trials achieving a moderate to large SBP reduction (≥2 mmHg) demonstrated a significant 22% relative risk reduction in stroke (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71-0.85) with a highly significant test of subgroup difference (p=0.001).

Although anxiety and depression contributed les than 4% of variance, they were consistently highly significant predictors ( p < 0.001) of QOL, and played greater roles than the personal and parental background factors.

BDNF had the best results with a highly significant increased neuron survival in comparison to the negative control (45.7% ± 12.6% versus 10.7% ± 4.2%; P < 0.001), as well as compared to all other experimental groups ( P < 0.001).

Relation of hind feet position score and angles measured using a digital protractor and a compass app The relationship between DIG and COMP, was highly significant (model A in Online Resource 2 , p < 0.001), suggesting a close similarity between the DIG and COMP values.

However, the factor combination impression material * tray material was highly significant ( p < 0.001).