Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

extremely significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
The down-regulation of miR-664b has a potential association with the extremely significant up-regulation of interleukin 17A ( IL17A ) (18.584-fold change, p < 0.001) in S. aureus -inoculated quarters, which plays a crucial role in the defense of Gram-positive bacterial infection and inflammation development [ 45 , 46 , 47 ].
highly significantp -value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The epicardial adipose tissue measurement, according to the Iacobelli method and the indexed epicardial adipose tissue thickness ( Figure 1 ), both showed a highly significant correlation with the EAT ROS levels ( p -value < 0.001), indicating that greater epicardial adipose tissue thickness is associated with increased oxidative stress in epicardial adipose tissue ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp<0,0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Conversely, after 48 hours, a highly significant increase in absorbance is detected for Asclepios in comparison with the clones NCSC2 to 6 (p<0,001; repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tuckey post-test), reflecting an elevated number of cells in the wells and a higher proliferation rate in an interval of 48 hours. 7.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
significant myelin‐specific DTH responses were not observed in mice tested at early times post‐infection (which had only recently developed clinical scores indicative of demyelinating disease), but highly significant ( P <0.001) responses were observed in chronically‐diseased animals (nine mice tested 36–48 weeks following infection).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All four polynomial terms of position were very highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that the percentages of hapax nouns out of all words across positions in turns develop across three points of inflection, of which the last sets the stage for a steep rise in percentages of hapax nouns toward turn-final position ( Figure 6 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
hildren with malignancy (P=0.001), estimated risk 4.1 times. Dividing the mothers by childhood cancer type, showed an increased risk of breast cancer in mothers of children with leukaemia and lymphoma which was not statistically significant (P=0.16), estimated risk 2.2 times in contrast to a highly significant (P < 0.001) increased risk in mothers of children with solid tumours, estimated risk 8.9 times.