Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Effects detected by ex vivo assays For PACs regimen, ex vivo epithelial cell adhesion assay indicated highly significant reductions in bacterial adhesion to T24 cells compared to placebo ( p < 0.001) following the consumption of cranberry dosages containing 60 mg of PACs (Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The drug combination inhibited both the AKT and MAPK pathways almost completely ( Figure 4 B), thereby evidencing a highly significant synergistic inhibition of cell proliferation, as indicated by the comparison with the theoretical interaction curve in the Bliss experimental model ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 C).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pain and anxiety assessments were conducted using various scales and Physiological parameters such as pulse rate and oxygen saturation levels were recorded and the resultant data were systematically tabulated for subsequent statistical analysis. Results Virtual reality group showed highly significant result in terms of lowering anxiety and pain scores compared to audio, audio visual, stress ball groups ( p <0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Among species with significant seasonal variability, Echinops kebericho showed a highly significant difference in usage ( p < 0.001), with greater utilisation during both seasons (71.2% and 72.7% in Gamo and Wolaita, respectively) compared to the wet and dry seasons separately.
markedly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
While nonsignificant results were found for individuals with minimal concerns ( b = 0.08; odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, p = 0.791), markedly significant results ( p < 0.001) emerged for those expressing more concerns with b = 1.45 and OR = 4.28.
a significant trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Linear by linear χ 2 tests were performed to identify linear trends; low levels of nuclear expression of osterix had a significant trend with increasing tumour grade (χ 2 = 12.969, d.f.=2, P < 0.001), increasing pleomorphism variation score (χ 2 = 7.120, d.f.=2, P = 0.008), and worse NPI prognostic group (χ 2 = 10.831, d.f.=2, P < 0.001) at the time of presentation; data is shown in Table 1 .
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The enrichment analysis revealed that bZIP transcription factors were the most significantly overrepresented family predicted to bind histone gene promoters, with multiple members (e.g., Seita.1G043800) showing highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S7).
quite significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Greater suppression of spontaneous motor activity in ME‐400 mg/kg‐treated groups was observed at all time intervals as compared to the ME‐200 mg/kg treated group, and was quite significant (*** p < 0.001) with respect to the negative control group.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Enterobacter hormaechei exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with N (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), while Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella paramesenteroides showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlations with R, with correlation coefficients of −0.74 and −0.73, respectively. 4.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive associations between all latent constructs, ranging from 0.47 to 0.84, indicating their multiple interconnectedness. 3.5.2 Path model We tested the predictive associations between the psychological and health awareness constructs from 2012 to 2019 in a cross-lagged panel model.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Post-hoc LSD tests revealed that: (1) for depression scores, the DOR with depression group scored significantly higher than both the DOR without depression group and the healthy control group (both P < 0.001), with no difference between the latter two groups; (2) regarding hormone levels and follicle counts, there were no significant differences between the two DOR subgroups (all P > 0.05), but both subgroups showed highly significant differences compared to the healthy control group (all P < 0.001), manifested as significantly elevated follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels, and significantly decreased anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle counts.