Excerpts

The differences between the MA and SA patterns and between the LA and SA patterns were highly significant (both P < 0.001).

Sum of squares 35~ 163.93 112.97 Among donors Among chicks within donors Mean square 4.821 2.054 4.821 Thus, F - 2.05~ - 2.347 which, with 34 and 55 degrees of freedom, is highly significant (p < 0.001).

When the coercion condition was entered simultaneously with perceived motives, the relationship between condition and high-level behaviors diminished (β = -.30, p = .05); however, consistent with our motive-matching model, perceived motives remained a highly significant predictor of intentionality (β = .59, p < .001).

The results revealed that application of higher voltages resulted in a highly significant increase ( P ≤0.001) in the resultant NF diameter ( Table 2 ).

The regression model for MCS was also highly significant ( F = 73.928, p < 0.001), accounting for 57.6% of the variance (Adjusted R 2 = 0.576), as presented in Table 5 .

Correlation analyses considered the influences for each pretreatment, with Table 8 showing correlations ≥ .70 which were also highly significant ( P ≤ .001).

In contrast, analysis of US specimens yielded a highly significant result ( r statistic = 0.515, p = 0.001).

napus seeds show a highly significant negative correlation ( r = −0.22, P < 0.001) in the natural population (Figure S6 ).

Expectedly, all CEQ subscales except the Death subscale correlated negatively (or showed a trend towards negative correlations), with the strongest effect (r = -.36, p < .001) for Fear.

Total area and hole area did not show significant differences ( p = 0.0749 and respectively 0.0820), while IOD, roundness and heterogeneity showed significant differences ( p < 0.05), and the perimeter, fractal dimension, ferret and clumpiness showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Gradient‐based depletion of proliferating HCC cells was thus highly significant for both HepG2 and Huh‐7 cell cultures ( P < .001, Figure 3 A,B).

Patients with an SDI ≥4 showed significantly higher ICA-RI (0.70 (0.68–0.77, IQR) vs 0.67 (0.60–0.72, IQR); p=0.032), while differences in ICA-PI (1.34 (1.22–1.69, IQR) vs 1.19 (1.01–1.51, IQR); p=0.057) approached, but did not reach statistical significance. cIMT correlated with age (r=0.47, p<0.001), MAP (r=0.302, p<0.001) and long-term medication with statin (r=0.26, p<0.001) and showed an inverse association with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r=−0.202, p=0.011). cIMT was furthermore lower in patients with ENA-positivity than in those without detectable ENA (0.78 mm (0.69–0.9, IQR) vs 0.84 mm (0.74–0.95, IQR); p=0.012).

Logistic regression revealed a highly significant temporal trend ( p <.001) with substantial increases in female representation across decades.

According to the perMANOVA results ( Table 3 ), temperature had the strongest effect on the PC scores, explaining 47.9% of the total variance (R2 = 0.479), showing in parallel highly significant results ( p < 0.001).

Wearing a glove leads to a highly significant increase of force reduction from 61.6 N/s in the baseline condition to 89.5 N/s in the glove condition (PostHoc: t (21) = − 6.8, p < 0.001, d = − 1.5, BF 10 > 100).

All pairwise comparisons of differences in dietary GHGEs between all quintiles were also highly significant ( P < 0·001), except for quintile four compared with quintile five for the women ( P = 0·061) (Table 5 ).

These differences were highly significant (P < 0.001) in each instance.

However, when time was incorporated as a continuous variable in our analysis, there was an increasing trend in MMP-9 activities over time ( p = 0.001).

Analysis of variance using the statistical model Number of aphids = day + day × height + day × site(tree) + day × height × site(tree) + ε showed that the first order interaction of day with site was highly significant ( F 3,1504 = 27.76, P < 0.001), just as population differences among trees remained detectable after having accounted for time-dependent and site-dependent differences ( F 4,1504 = 13.92, P < 0.001).

The main effect of regulation type was highly significant ( F (1,115) = 290.42, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.716), with participants reporting fewer negative feelings in the reappraisal (3.02 ± 1.02) than in the no-reappraisal (5.00 ± 1.02) sessions.

Using the NIPS pain score of the OS-NPA as the golden standard, the result showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and inter-rater reliability for both single and average measures between the VB-NPA, with neonatal pain videos captured in a real-world NICU scenario, and OS-NPA, with a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001).

Overall, a correlation with distance was observed, with a clear trend for slow transients to occur in the distal parts of the dendrites ( Figure 3C , r = 0.43, P < 0.001; see also GC in Figure 4B ).

The differences between trainee and specialist within the individual interventions were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).

By repeated-measures ANOVA analysis of patients with abnormal CXR scores (n = 37), there was a significant trend for improvement from 3 to 12 months (p = 0.001).

The relative increase in the a- and b-wave amplitudes in the NFE2L2 KO treated mice was highly significant (Figures 1(a) and 1(b) ; p < 0.001 for both waves), surpassing the amplitudes of even the WT control group.