Barely Significant
← all phrases

a decreasing trend

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 77,245 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The branch K/P ratio peaked under the F3 treatment at 120 and 150 days, showing significant increases of 117.5% and 41.9%, respectively, compared to CK ( p < 0.05), but exhibited a decreasing trend by 180 days, with the F4 treatment showing a significant decrease of 37.6% compared to CK ( p < 0.05). 3.4.
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Morphological Indices and Whole-Body Composition As shown in Table 4 , the HSI and VSI of the rice field eel exhibited a decreasing trend with increasing dietary threonine levels; the T4 group was significantly lower than the control group ( p < 0.05).
a decreasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
2 C); however, LDTN stimulation decreased the LF/HF ratio (LF/HF ratio 1.06 ± 0.29 versus 2.11 ± 0.46, P < 0.05), the LF (nu) value showed a decreasing trend (LF 36.99 ± 10.50 versus 53.03 ± 14.46, P > 0.05) and the HF (nu) showed an increasing trend (HF 35.95 ± 11.48 versus 31.34 ± 6.13, P > 0.05).
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The results showed that after knocking down ALOX12B, the mRNA and protein levels of ALOX12B in 16HBE cells did exhibit a decreasing trend ( p < 0.05) (Figs. 6 A, B, and S 5 ); The mRNA levels of inflammation-related factors GMCSF, IL-6, IL-33, and MUC5AC (Fig. 6C ) as well as their protein levels (Fig. 6D ) were significantly decreased ( p < 0.05).
a decreasing trendP>0.051.0× alphagold
Effects of Morusin and MAS on the Water Content in the Rat Skin The skin water content of the paw pads in the model group was reduced compared to the normal group ((Paw pad of left forelimb: model group, 29.2 ± 1.7 versus control group, 32.7 ± 2.5, P<0.05; paw pad of right forelimb: model group, 28.7 ± 2.5 versus control group, 32.8 ± 2.3, P<0.05; paw pad of left hindlimb: model group, 30.4 ± 1.3 versus control group, 32.4 ± 1.2, P<0.05; paw pad of right hindlimb: model group, 29.7 ± 1.1 versus control group, 32.8 ± 2.2, P<0.05; n = 10; Figure 2 ), with a decreasing trend in back skin water content that was not statistically significant (Back: model group, 24.0 ± 0.6 versus control group, 24.8 ± 1.1, P>0.05; n = 10; Figure 2 ).
a decreasing trendp-value<0.051.0× alphagold
an increasing trendp-value<0.051.0× alphagold
The interpretation of trends followed predefined statistical criteria: a decreasing trend (p-value<0.05 with a negative coefficient), an increasing trend (p-value<0.05 with a positive coefficient), and a stable trend (p-value≥0.05), according to a validated methodology ( 19 ).
a decreasing trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
The Shannon index and Ace index in two groups showed an increasing trend after intervention, and the Simpson index showed a decreasing trend, but there was no statistical difference ( p > 0.05; Supplementary Table S2 ; Supplementary Figure S2 ). 3.2.3.