Barely Significant
← all phrases

a negative trend

1,820 sentences · 1,820 papers · 9,596 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendP = 0.3787.6× alphagold
Median DOR showed a negative trend ( r = −0.20, P = 0.378) against median OS, which may have been confounded by the negative trend ( r = −0.36, P = 0.096) observed between ORR and median DOR in the ICI-based regimens ( Supplementary Figure S1 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105754 ).
a negative trendp = 0.397.8× alphagold
The proportion of naive T cells showed a negative trend association with the 17‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD‐17, r = −0.22, p = 0.39) or 16‐item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology–Self‐Report (QIDS, r = −0.37, p = 0.10) scores, which was not seen in GZMH + CD8 + Tm cells (Figure 2B–D,F–H ).
a negative trendp = 0.3937.9× alphagold
For state 3, the WAB‐AQ scores showed a negative trend with both FT ( r = −0.328, p = 0.393) and MDT ( r = −0.382, p = 0.225), but the correlation was not significant. 4 Discussion The present study employed the ICA‐based sliding window technique and k ‐means clustering method to investigate alterations in dFNC and the relationship between the temporal properties of dynamic networks in patients with PSA and language dysfunction.
a negative trendP = .469.2× alphagold
In women, positive trends between the time elapsed since COVID-19 infection onset (less than 2 years) and physical health (Tau = 0.050, P = .51), mental health (0.044, P = .56), and reaction time (0.035, P = .63), with fatigue being significantly affected (Tau = 0.158, P = .039), and also a negative trend with error rates (Tau = −0.055, P = .46) were observed.
a negative trendP = 0.55211.0× alphagold
Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a positive linear relationship for the risk of limb ischemia (linear, P = 0.006; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 [95% CI, 0.656–0.848]), a U-shaped trend for bleeding events (nonlinear, P = 0.214), and a negative trend for thrombotic events (linear, P = 0.552).
a negative trendp = 0.612.0× alphagold
In order to exclude the possibility that the NLR trend was due to a concurrent bacterial or fungal superinfection, we compared the rates of superinfections among patients who had a positive trend with those who had a negative trend and observed that the presence of a superinfection was not associated with a higher NLR trend at admission (χ 2 (1, N = 469) = 0.45, p = 0.6) ( Fig. 4 ).
a negative trendp = .67113.4× alphagold
The direction of the simple slopes for each condition suggests a pro-inflammatory phenotype had a positive trend on stress recovery in the nature condition (SNS: β = -0.335, 95% CI [-0.586, -0.083], p = .010; RMSSD: β = 0.134, 95% CI [-0.117, 0.385], p = .290; PNS: β = 0.186, 95% CI [-0.043, 0.414], p = 0.110) but a negative trend on stress recovery in the office condition (SNS: β = 0.055, 95% CI [-0.202, 0.311], p = .671; RMSSD: β = -0.248, 95% CI [-0.502, 0.007], p = .056; PNS: β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.381, 0.084], p = .206), although these trends were modest and mostly non-significant.