Barely Significant
← all phrases

a positive trend

6,775 sentences · 6,775 papers · 20,246 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp = 0.265.2× alphagold
In contrast, interventions shorter than one year, while demonstrating a positive trend (OR = 1.42[0.77–2.62]), did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.26) and exhibited moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2=40%).
a positive trendp = 0.275.4× alphagold
Regarding to OS analysis, absence of liver metastases confirmed to be associated with better outcomes ( p = 0.0002); conversely, “high” leptin/VAT ratio did not reached stastical significance, despite a positive trend toward association was still confirmed ( p = 0.27), considering the early follow-up evalutation (Table 2 ).
a positive trendp = 0.285.6× alphagold
Although we found a positive trend, the relationship was not significant (logarithmic regression: R 2 = 0.22, F 1,6 = 1.45; p = 0.28) due to one outlying data point ( P. nyererei × A. calliptera , cross 7; the exclusion of this outlier resulted in a strong positive correlation: R 2 = 0.81, F 1,5 = 17.32; p = 0.014).
a positive trendp = 0.285.6× alphagold
When performing a simple mixed effects logistic regression model, the less finely ground, pelleted feed did not seem to significantly impact the odds of severe gastric lesions, however, there was a positive trend towards an effect (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 1.72 (0.64–4.63), p = 0.28).
a positive trendp = 0.295.8× alphagold
concluded that in patients presenting with STEMI, there was a positive trend towards further reduction of MACE (0.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.29) and a significantly less late lumen loss (− 0.09 ± 0.09 vs. 0.10 ± 0.19, p < 0.05) at 6 months in the DEB treatment group than in the DES treatment group [ 15 ].
a positive trendp = 0.295.8× alphagold
However, the direction of effects was informative: in the older group, psychological investment showed a positive trend ( β = 0.09, p = 0.29 at T2 → T3) while behavioral time was near zero ( β = −0.01, p = 0.88), consistent with the hypothesis that cognitive processing is more consequential than behavioral exposure.
a positive trendp = 0.3456.9× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.3456.9× alphaplainly factual
In contrast, the percentage of core involvement in the septum exhibited a positive trend (mean coefficient β = 5.05%; 95% CI, − 5.64 to 15.73%) relative to DCM, which, did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.345). z -score analysis of CMR signal intensities across myocardial locations and layers Table 4 details the regression analysis of CMR signal intensity z -scores across various myocardial wall locations (anterior wall, lateral wall, inferior wall, and septum) and layers (sub-endocardium, mid-myocardium, and sub-epicardium) in patients diagnosed with DCM vs. those with cardiac sarcoidosis.
a positive trendP = 0.3737.5× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.3737.5× alphaplainly factual
Although sarcopenia assessed by PMI showed a positive trend with postoperative major complications [ 18 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 42 , 44 ], it did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.72–1.61, P = 0.373, I 2 = 58.3%).
a positive trendp = 0.3867.7× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.3867.7× alphaplainly factual
Interestingly, while hospital-wide clinical volume showed a positive trend with NSIs occurrences, it did not reach statistical significance as an independent predictor in the multivariable environment (IRR = 0.47, p = 0.386), suggesting that setting-specific factors and pandemic-related phase shifts were the primary drivers of risk fluctuations. 3.2.2.