“a possible trend”

The second one were patients with chronic OSD in regard to change in the Lysholm scale, which showed a possible trend for significant association between given parameters ( p = 0.0086).

Considering the recipients’ immunization status, we observed a possible trend for faster rejection of highly immunized patients in v1 compared to non-immunized patients ( p = 0.019).

5 B, evaluated the questionnaire responses for each model, indicating no statistical significance between Models A and B (Q1 p =0.8988), a possible trend towards significance between Models A and C (Q1 p =0.0540), and a statistically significant difference between Models B and C (Q1 p =0.0052).

Symptom severity Subgroup analysis found no statistically significant differences in symptom severity between the wild-type and mutant groups, except for a possible trend suggesting greater pain severity in the mutant group, which neared statistical significance ( p = 0.056) (Table 5 ).

However, a possible trend emerged where G3 was associated with higher odds of larger tumor size (OR = 1.991, 95% CI: 0.978–4.051, p = 0.058).

While we found that the ratio of brain volume to ICV is not significantly different overall, there is a possible trend ( p = .06) which further analysis showed to be primarily among men ( p = .08) compared with women ( n = .4).

Sensitivity analysis Due to wide variability in timing of the post treatment visits we also performed a linear regression analysis using the treatment groups as predictors and using VAS pain score at the follow-up visits as outcomes with and without adjustment for time to follow-up (days), the adjusted models showed a possible trend at the first follow-up visit ( p = 0.06) and were significant for the other follow-up visits ( p < 0.05).

The results suggest a possible trend of increased SCRT in more advanced stage III/IV, although not statistically significant ( P = 0.06; Fig. 4D ).

Anti-apoA1 IgG was not associated with FRS, cIMT, or FMD, despite a possible trend with FRS and cIMT in the PLWH ART-treated group ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.083, respectively) ( Table 2 ).

The synchrony variable did not correlate significantly with any of the CANTAB components, although there was a possible trend with SWM performance (Spearman’s ρ = −.155, p = .068).

The rate is markedly higher in patients with PSA > 0.15 ng/mL than in their counterparts with lesser PSA concentrations, but the difference only shows a possible trend toward statistical significance ( p = 0.07). 4.

There was a possible trend towards orthodontic device use in TS (OR 3.20; p = 0.076).

However, colistin resistance shows a possible trend towards significance from T1 to T2 ( p = 0.08), suggesting some degree of increase.

No significant differences between groups were found for GABA/Cr, but a possible trend ( p = 0.08) was present.

There was no correlation between the AMT1 copy number per nanogram of DNA and the family response to nitrogen, but there was a possible trend at HAN of increased AMT1 copy number in the 100 N treated rhizosphere compared to the 0 N rhizosphere (p = .087, Student’s t-test; S1 Fig ).

These detailed neuropsychological assessments did not reveal a difference between the MCI and TREM2 p.R47H groups except a possible trend for participants with mild cognitive impairment to have worse ADAS-Cog 13 scores than TREM2 p.R47H carriers ( P = 0.09).

Although there was no significant difference in survival curves for specific risk criteria ( figure 2B ), we did identify a possible trend for higher risk of transition in CHR-P who did, vs did not, meet both APS and COGDIS criteria at baseline, χ 2 (1, n = 116) = 2.794, P = .095 (see supplementary table 12 for cumulative hazard rates for transition at different follow-up assessments).

Positive IGFBP-3 expression showed a possible trend in association with increased proliferation ( P = 0.096), oestrogen receptor (ER) negativity ( P = 0.06) and HER-2 overexpression ( P = 0.065) in invasive tumours and a strong association with ER negativity ( P = 0.037) in DCIS.

Factors with significant change and those that showed a possible trend (p < 0.1) were included in the linear regression analysis evaluating the influence on predictors of spinopelvic change.

Only the variable of SI was statistically significant ( p = 0.034) from the IVGTT while DI was a possible trend ( p = 0.11).

These differences approached statistical significance, suggesting a possible trend toward longer recovery periods in the aprotinin group ( p = 0.11 for ICU stay and p = 0.13 for hospital stay).

There was a possible trend toward greater increase in periventricular lesion burden in the MM group at 6 weeks (0.00 vs 0.04, P = .12) but not at 1 year (0.08 vs 0.19, P = .25).

Cases with and without a PDV are not significantly more or less likely to have an affected first-degree relative with a substantial NDD; although, there is a possible trend (+PDV 13/34 (38%) with a first-degree relative affected, no PDV 3/16 (19%), p = 0.18, odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 0.6–11).

Meanwhile, PSA and mSEPT9 differences remained insignificant, indicating a possible trend ( p = 0.240 and 0.263, respectively).

38.41 pg/mL in non-carriers), suggesting a possible trend ( p = 0.27).