Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

9,776 sentences · 9,776 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendP = 0.06531.3× alphagold
Results Experiment 1: The Multidose Pilot Locomotor Activity Dose-related pharmacological effect on locomotor activity, after treatment with TP-22, showed a significant trend ( F (3,38) = 2.612, P = 0.0653), confirmed by post hocs (see below), whereas interaction between time and treatment did not show significance ( F (21,266) = 0.769, P = 0.7570).
a significant trendP = 0.0661.3× alphagold
In addition, H-MR had a significant trend ( P = 0.066) to increase the crypt depth of the ileum compared to BD. 3.6 Intestinal barrier function Analyzed the mRNA expression levels of Claudin-1, Occludin and zonula occludens-1 ( ZO-1 ) in the small intestine were presented in Fig. 3 .
a significant trendp=0.0681.4× alphagold
All patients (100%) in the laser group rated their improvement as “better”, “much better”, or “very much better”, compared to 53.8% in the placebo group, as shown in Figure 5 . Similarly, at 3 months, the PGS questionnaire was rated as “extremely satisfied”, “very satisfied”, or “moderately satisfied” by 85.8% of patients in the laser group, compared to 46.2% in the sham group, showing a significant trend (p=0.068).
a significant trendp = 0.0691.4× alphagold
Simple slope analysis results ( Figure 2 ) indicate that for J-N1 learners, there was a significant trend of L2 processing efficiency predicting Chinese lexical processing efficiency ( β = 0.01, se = 0.00, df = 1,006, t = 1.82, p = 0.069), suggesting that higher L2 Japanese lexical processing efficiency was associated with an increased tendency for Chinese lexical processing efficiency.
a significant trendp = 0.0691.4× alphagold
The same ANOVA also revealed a significant trend of group differences in the tract connecting the left cerebellum and the right cerebrum [ F (2, 56) = 2.809, p = 0.069: bottom panel in Fig. 5 b] The post hoc analysis revealed a significant trend of lower HMOA values in the CH group than in the AD group ( p = 0.069).