“a statistical trend”

A statistical trend was observed with a p -value between 0.05 and 0.10.

[ 13 ] showed a significant statistical relationship particularly among halitosis ( p = 0.001) and taste changes ( p = 0.001) in UC adult patients with a statistical trend regarding the other parameters.

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 was defined as a statistical trend.

The OR for increased serum ALP activity showed a statistical trend in favour of potassium bromide.

The infants who developed NEC showed a non-statistical trend of a higher postnatal age when starting enteral feeding and receiving lower advances in enteral feeding (maximum increases do not exceed 25 mL/kg/day), resulting in a statistical trend of lower nutritional support ( Table 4 ).

Although IRS-2 protein was also reduced in ethanol-fed rats, the difference from control only constituted a statistical trend.

Furthermore, a statistical trend was established from analyzing our data regarding the tumor's histological type and the concordance of fMRI and DCS findings.

A p ‐value < 0.05 was considered indicative of a statistical trend prior to correction; only p ‐values that remained significant after FDR adjustment were interpreted as statistically robust. 2.7 Ethical Approval All procedures involving human participants in this study were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Although some of the P values do not reach the threshold for statistical significance, they are low enough to imply a statistical trend, which remains clinically relevant.

However, there was a statistical trend for a positive correlation between the proportion of close bouts by visual assessment (number normalized to the lowest number possible for each pair) and the strength of cross-correlations ( r = 0.444; n = 18; p = 0.065).

Still, these studies were correlated with experimental studies and case series that report a statistical trend over the popular.

However, the between-group difference in expected rewards of gambles can be considered a statistical trend.

Pediatric surgery procedures were an exception; the last phase of the surgery, emergence from anesthesia, was associated with more strain, albeit only as a statistical trend.

Accordingly, results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, and results at p < 0.1 were interpreted as showing a statistical trend.

There was a statistical trend for differences in minor and major complications (data for CON vs.

48 – 50 A recent systematic review 51 indicated that multiple HVLA thrusts delivered over several treatment sessions resulted in a statistical trend towards improving pain pressure scores and self-report levels of pain. 52 Further, a single treatment session, which involved multiple osteopathic and manipulative techniques, immediately reduced self-reported pain relative to a control group in patients with acute LAS. 53 Similarly, studies that used multiple manipulative techniques 54 , 55 delivered over several treatment sessions reported significant improvements in pain outcome measures.

According to the threshold defined in Section 2.5, this result is considered marginally significant, indicating a statistical trend rather than a significant difference at α = 0.05.

The significance level was set at alpha = 0.05, with a statistical trend in cases of < 0.1.

A statistical trend often does not imply accuracy in specific predictions.

Other differences showed a statistical trend but were not significant.

While most prominent descriptors are not positively correlated with each other, there is a notable exception concerning electronic (MolMR) and structural features (1χ, MolWt, and HeavyAtomCounts). Although this correlation might be understandable by similarities in how these quantitative descriptors are generated, this behavior is not only a statistical trend.

In addition, a statistical trend was detected for CSF pTau ( Figure 1 A).

NAA levels in M1 showed a statistical trend between concussed and control athletes.

rest) on the subscale for “positive feelings toward God” emergent depression was 0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.96; Wald 4.2; p = .040), a statistical trend.

A statistical trend in favor of this decrease was observed in patients not previously treated with TDF at baseline (−10 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in TDF treated patients at baseline vs −15 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively; P = .07).