“a trend toward significance”

P > 0.05 was considered statistically significant, but P < 0.1 was considered as a trend toward significance and indicated with # . # P < 0.1, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.

Furthermore, there was a trend toward significance of the entire model (multiple R = 0.3, multiple R 2 = 0.08, adjusted R 2 = 0.04, F = 1.98, p = 0.1).

For set 3, age showed a trend toward significance, with the intercept being 0.19 for newborns ( [ − 0.03 , 0.40 ] , z = 1.72 , p < 0.1 ), and the decreases in effect magnitude were 0.07 for 6-month-olds, 0.36 for 7-month-olds, and 0.29 for 9-month-olds (Table S6 in the Supplementary Material ).

Factors that showed a trend toward significance in the univariate analysis ( p < 0.1) were then entered into a step-down multivariable linear regression analysis to determine independent risk factors.

Variables significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis ( p < 0.05), as well as those showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10), were entered into a multivariate Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results from the association tests were considered significant if: 1) the p -value from the all-sib analysis was lower than 0.0005, and 2) the one-sib analysis also showed a trend toward significance ( p -value < 0.1).

Moreover, four LCFAs and one VLCFA, namely arachidic acid, cis -11-eicosenoic acid, cis -11,14-eicosadienoic acid, cis -5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid, and lignoceric acid, showed a trend toward significance (0.05 < p < 0.1).

B6J males had significantly shorter latencies on Day 5 of acquisition testing ( F 1,182 = 4.29; p < 0.05), a trend toward significance on Day 6 of reversal testing ( F 1,148 = 2.76; p < 0.1) and significantly shorter latencies on Days 4 ( F 1,143 = 3.77; p < 0.05) and 5 ( F 1,143 = 7.29; p < 0.01) of shift-reduced testing after correcting for speed as a covariate.

Main effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and were considered as a trend toward significance when P ≤ 0.10.

P -values < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance, with a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

While the p ‐values did not reach the conventional threshold of statistical significance ( p < 0.05), the proportion of female patients (Figure 4A ) and the proportion of TKI usage (Figure 4B ) appear to be negatively associated with the CRR, as both variables demonstrate a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1).

Among control variables, marital status was included in the final model, as it showed a trend toward significance ( p <.10) in the bivariate analysis.

A multivariate linear regression model was subsequently constructed using the backward stepwise selection method, initially including all variables with significance ( p < 0.05) or a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis.

Significant difference was considered at p<0.05 and a trend toward significance was considered at 0.05<p<0.1.

Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and considered a trend toward significance at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Analysis of subtypes of depression according to no depression, non-endogenomorphic depression, and endogenomorphic depression showed a trend toward significance [ F (2, 46) = 2.46, p < 0.1].

First, there was a pattern of poorer scores for the EHR group on the WAI, including a trend toward significance ( P =.10) on the subscale focused on agreement on tasks to achieve identified goals.

Although not reaching the conventional threshold for statistical significance, certain indicators demonstrated a trend toward significance ( P < 0.1).

However, the present analysis revealed that individuals with higher preoperative superoxide dismutase (SOD) concentration who did not develop delirium were characterized by increased miR-183-5p levels (a trend toward significance; p < 0.1).

‘*’, ‘**’, ‘***’, and ‘****’ are used in figures to denote statistical significance at the p≤0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001 levels, respectively, and ‘o’ is used to indicate a trend toward significance (defined as 0.05<p≤0.1).

Moreover, at the four-week follow-up, a trend toward significance ( p < 0.1) was observed utilizing the unpaired t-test when comparing the time spent completing the cognitive TUG and MoCA scores of the HIGT and control group, with the HIGT group outperforming.

Exact P -values are shown for comparisons with a trend toward significance (0.05≤ P <0.10).

sporadic) demonstrated a trend toward significance with an HR of 2.10 (95% CI: 0.86–5.08, P = .10).

The dam's behavior of grooming herself shows a trend toward significance for the Sex × Day interaction, F (2,76) = 2.38; P < 0.10 and this likely reflects that her grooming tends to decrease over days with male pups but tends to increase over days with female pups.

A trend toward significance was defined as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.