Barely Significant
← all phrases

almost significant

515 sentences · 515 papers · 2,294 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

There is a significant quadratic effect for the δ 15 N of Equus (age 2 : β = 0.09, SE = 0.034, 95% CI [0.02:0.16], Table S7 ) and almost significant effect for Rangifer (age 2 : β = 0.04, SE = 0.021, 95% CI [0.00:0.08], Table S8 ) in the intermediate levels of the site with the lowest overall δ 15 N exhibited in horses in US04 lower, corresponding with the Heinrich 4 event at the site.
The maximum mouth opening measured by the end of the third month was 29.71 mm, and by the end of the sixth month, it was 34.98 mm, with an average mean of 30.01 mm and a confidence interval ranging from 27.6–32.4 mm by the end of the sixth month of therapy, with a statistically non-significant (but almost significant) P -value of 0.058 ( Table 3 , Figure 5 ).
1 ). Significant group*time effect for NRS ( p < 0.001), NDI ( p : 0.009), and PPTs of the remote site ( p : 0.010) and significant main effect for time for NRS ( p < 0.001) and NDI ( p : 0.019) and an almost significant main effect for time (p: 0.052) for PPTs of the remote site were calculated and presented in Figs. 2 and 3 .
This result is more evident in relation to steel plants, with an almost significant 90% excess risk in age 0–1, and with some evidence of excess of hospitalization for neoplasms also in the 0-19- (S – males n = 121, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.08 (0.90–1.28), (1-p)%=55%, females n = 102, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.12 (0.93–1.35), (1-p)%=71%) and 20-29-years age groups (S – males n = 145, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 0.99 (0.80–1.22), (1-p)%=6%, females n = 140, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.08 (0.85–1.36), (1-p)%=44%) (Additional file 2).
Cox regression analyses revealed a significantly improved survival on a univariate level (HR=0.709, 95% CI: 0.535-0.939, p = = 0.016), as well as an almost significant impact in combination with the standard prognostic covariates age, FIGO stage and residual tumor burden (HR=0.736, 95% CI: 0.535-1.011, p = = 0.059).
From the best synchrony model (model 6; Table S4 ), the geometric mean lambda for Antarctic fur seals was estimated as 0.984 [0.974, 0.995], equivalent to an annual decline of 2% since 1985; and for southern elephant seals, the geometric mean lambda was estimated as 0.993 [0.985, 1.001], equivalent to an almost significant annual decline of 1%.