Barely Significant
← all phrases

an increasing trend

38,134 sentences · 38,134 papers · 105,713 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendP = 0.0420.8× alphagold
By the Cochrane-Armitage test, there was evidence of an increasing trend in the proportion of participants experiencing a grade 3–5 AE ( P = 0.042) by tertile of AUC ( P = 0.022) and in the proportion of participants experiencing any SAE by tertile of AUC ( P = 0.011; Tables 2 and 3 ).
an increasing trendP =0.0440.9× alphagold
Compared to definite morning-type medical students, those with moderate morning, intermediate, moderate evening and definite evening chronotype showed an increasing trend of weight change ( P =0.044), with definite evening-type students gaining 0.88 kg on average (95% CI: 0.10, 1.65), consistent after adjusting for confounders.
an increasing trendp = 0.04590.9× alphagold
However, a significant difference emerged with respect to the NDI scores, which exhibited an increasing trend in values corresponding to deeper levels of subsidence ( p = 0.0459) with a mean of 10.7 pts for the 2–3 mm subgroup, 11.9 pts for 3–4 mm and 13.5 pts for ≥4 mm of implant migration into adjacent endplate ( Table 3 ). 4.
an increasing trendp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
The model intercept, i.e., the initial value of dyadic coping of 112.60, showed an increasing trend in the subsequent three measurements [slope(S) = 0.228, p = 0.047], and there was a significant correlation between the intercept and the slope ( r = −0.488, p < 0.001), suggesting that there was a significant negative correlation between the initial state of dyadic coping in patients with malignant bone tumors and the speed of development, i.e., the higher the initial level of dyadic coping in patients with malignant bone tumors, the slower the rate of increase in the later stage ( Figure 3 ).
an increasing trendP = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Evaluation of gene expression across pathological stages of STAD revealed an increasing trend of COL4A1 expression with disease progression, reaching statistical significance between stage I and stage IV ( P = 0.048), whereas THBS2, CTNNB1, and E2F3 showed no significant stage-dependent variation (Fig. 2 C).
an increasing trendp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
A joinpoint analysis revealed an increasing trend of 0.34 ( p = 0.048) from 1981-89 and a stable trend from 1990 to 2014 ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\widehat{\beta}}_I $$\end{document} β ^ I =0.02, p = 0.531).
a decreasing trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
The Shannon index and Ace index in two groups showed an increasing trend after intervention, and the Simpson index showed a decreasing trend, but there was no statistical difference ( p > 0.05; Supplementary Table S2 ; Supplementary Figure S2 ). 3.2.3.