Barely Significant
← all phrases

approached significance

1,233 sentences · 1,233 papers · 9,379 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significanceP = 0.051.0× alpha
24 However, the difference in thromboembolic events approached significance with increasing TXA dosage (placebo: 12.0%; 2 g: 26.5%; 4 g: 32.0%; P = 0.05). 24 Systematic Review of In-Hospital Use of TXA in TBI The CRASH-3 study examined the effect of TXA on TBI death in 9,127 patients randomly assigned to receive treatment or placebo within 3 hours of injury.
approached significancep = .051.0× alpha
The main effect of Age approached significance, F (1, 58) = 4.01, p = .05 η p 2 = .065, BF 10 = 1.20, and there was no significant interaction between Age and Delay, F (1, 58) = 0.22, p = .64, η p 2 = .004, BF 10 = 0.63, indicating that compared with the Younger group the Older group had an overall lower level of recall (Marginal means: M Older = 24.3, M Young = 26.5) but did not differ in forgetting rate.
approached significancep < 0.051.0× alpha
Protein levels of CREB, JNK, and p70S6K, rose significantly after glucose treatment ( p < 0.01), and the increase in NF-κB, p38, ERK1/2, Akt, and STAT5 approached significance after glucose treatment ( p < 0.05), implying that glucose stimulated all these cytokines level toward a baseline (less neuroinflamed) condition ( Figure 2 ).
approached significanceP = 0.051.0× alpha
Regarding NRM, MVA identified increasing age at transplant per decade (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48; P = 0.002) as a significant factor for increased NRM, whereas MM donor status approached significance (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.99-2.59; P = 0.05).
approached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
On the other hand, for model 3, the MoRSAE approached significance in association with PTSD in the NCPTSD-TRACTS cohort (beta = -0.1707, p = 0.05) and had significant difference in risk scores between cases and controls ( p = 0.018) (Figure S7); however, the direction of effect was opposite to that observed in the discovery cohort.
approached significancep = 0.05091.0× alpha
We compared ApoE KO and WT network parameters and none were significantly different, including clustering coefficient (WT: 0.0097 ± 0.0030, ApoE KO: 0.0091 ± 0.0037, p = 0.68), small worldness (WT: 3.20E-05 ± 1.35E-05, ApoE KO: 2.98E-05 ± 2.08E-05, p = 0.79), global efficiency, though it approached significance, (WT: 0.025 ± 0.0052, ApoE KO: 0.021 ± 0.0037, p = 0.0509), and local efficiency (WT: 0.84 ± 0.22, ApoE KO: 0.77 ± 0.30, p = 0.58) ( Figure 4L ). 3.1.3.