Barely Significant
← all phrases

approaching significance

2,641 sentences · 2,641 papers · 3,313 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Any two-way interaction that was significant (α = 0.05) or approaching significance (<.10) was followed up with direct examinations of the underlying effects of interest, that is, potential differences between the two sessions (corresponding to on and off treatment for the patient groups) separately for each group and for each verb-type or object-type.
This remodeling between 14 and 28 d in the aneurysmal model is also suggested by the change in axial stiffness that occurred between 14 and 28 d in the ApoE −/− AngII infused aneurysmal mice, as there was initially a decrease in axial stiffness that was approaching significance, yet at 28 d ApoE −/− AngII infused aneurysmal mice had axial stiffness values closer to those found in the control mice.
Compared to retrospective cohort studies ( n = 40), most other study designs were associated with improved reporting completeness, with before-and-after design ( n = 27, +1.7, 95% CI 0.82–2.7), individual randomized controlled trials (RCT) ( n = 40, +2.0, 95% CI 1.1–2.8), and cluster RCTs ( n = 23, +1.7, 95% CI 0.79–2.7) all reaching statistical significance, and quasi-experimental designs approaching significance ( n = 7, +1.9, 95% CI −0.19 to 3.9).
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that graft placement does not significantly influence the likelihood of pseudarthrosis development following ACDF, despite graft location approaching significance.
Rapid Fire Presentations
Global Spine Journal · 2025 · PMC12099120
Paired samples t -tests revealed that participants were more accurate for the first 10 trials than the second 10 trials for both the full-size images [first 10: mean = 61.3%, SD = 19.8; second 10: mean = 49.1%, SD = 17.1; t (31) = 2.63, p = 0.013] and the 70% size images [first 10: mean = 57.7%, SD = 16.3; second 10: mean = 51.0%, SD = 16.6; t (38) = 1.86, p = 0.071], though for the latter comparison the p -value was only approaching significance.