borderline significancep = 0.06
Although this trend shows only borderline significance ( p = 0.06), this finding suggests a potential involvement of CAG repeat expansion in breast cancer susceptibility.
Although this trend shows only borderline significance ( p = 0.06), this finding suggests a potential involvement of CAG repeat expansion in breast cancer susceptibility.
DTC persistence resulted in a shorter PFS and OS reaching borderline significance ( p = 0.06; p = 0.07).
In the multivariable analyses, IDH and SH were associated with impaired LVGLS [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.69 and 2.66, P < 0.001], and borderline significance was observed for elevated BP (adjusted OR 1.90, P = 0.060); there was no significant association between any of the BP groups and LVGCS.
[ 8 ] and show borderline significance in univariate analysis in Supplementary Table 1 ( P = .06), we also included age and DBP in the current multivariate analysis.
The exceptions were firstly fetching wood, which was slightly more frequent among the cases (borderline significance, p=0.06); secondly, processing agricultural products (p=0.02), looking after a family member (p=0.0002) and making social visits (p=0.0002) were relatively more frequent in the comparison participants at 12-months; thirdly participation in washing clothes reduced in both groups at 12-months and was slightly less frequent in the comparison participants (borderline significance, p=0.05) ( Table 1 ).
Stage 1 Significant associations ( P < 0.05) with the DIVA-5-ID were found for questions 1, 2, 3 and 6, and borderline significance ( P = 0.06) for question 8 ( Table 3 ).
The overall estimate of effect size for conversion to THR favored the cell therapy group, although it reached only borderline significance levels (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.08–1.06; p = 0.06) in the presence of a moderate degree of statistical heterogeneity (Q-test = 4.39, df = 3, p = 0.22, and I 2 = 32%), ( Figure 6B , see Supplementary data).
Post-RT versus pre-RT ratio of SUV max was associated with OS with borderline significance (HR = 3.89, 95% CI, 0.94–16.02, p = 0.060).
It maintained a borderline significance when analyzed in the arterial thrombosis subgroup only (69.2 vs . 38.2%, p = 0.06).
For disease-free interval (DFI), significant protection was observed in esophageal carcinoma (ESCA: HR = 0.515, 0.312–0.850, p = 0.01), contrasting with elevated risk in LGG (HR = 3.498, 1.279–9.569, p = 0.015) and borderline significance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC: HR = 10.957, 0.904–132.845, p = 0.06)(Fig. 4 D).
Within the same model, the SDB outcome approached borderline significance for predicting cognitive delay ( p = 0.06) and motor delay ( p = 0.05).
With the random-effects model, the interventions resulted in 2.60 mg/d l lower fasting glucose with borderline significance (95% CI: -5.27 to 0.08, P=0.06).
The duration of hospitalization significantly correlated with CRP ( r = 0.15, p < 0.05) and neutrophil counts ( r = 0.16, p < 0.05), whereas a borderline significance was seen for the correlation between HDL-C levels and length of hospitalization ( r = 0.12, p = 0.06).
During this period, induced theta‐band activity showed lower with borderline significance in the restless legs syndrome subjects than in the controls regardless of channel location ( F 4,88 = 3.92, p = .06).
The GSTT2 a deletion was associated with reduced birth weight in full term controls with borderline significance when smoking status was not considered (Table 3B ; −65.3 g, p = 0.06), but was not associated with preterm birth or birth before 35 weeks (Table 2 ).
These associations reached statistical significance in one group (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.234, p = 0.04) and borderline significance in the other (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.199, p = 0.06).
Nonetheless, accuracy of BNP was reduced in active cancers (AUC 0.90 [9.85–0.95]), with borderline significance ( p = 0.06; online supplementary Figure S5 ).
The stem cell source tended to be associated with an increased risk of CNS complications with borderline significance ( P =0.06).
When evaluated in the multivariate logistic regression analysis only CCI had a borderline significance ( p = 0.06).
Low MASP-2 levels were also correlated with high MASP-3 levels, again only in MS patients with active disease, but with borderline significance (Spearman's r = −0.401, P = 0.06).
However, SFTPA , CEACAM5 and DSG3 exhibited similar trends, with borderline significance (P = 0.06, P = 0.07, and P = 0.09, respectively).
In addition, pregnant women with cesarean section were less likely to be nullipara with a borderline significance ( P = 0.060).
In Adjusted Model 2, the association remained significant for Q3 (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.07–2.33], P =0.02) and showed a borderline significance for Q4 (OR, 1.55 [95% CI, 0.99–2.43], P =0.06).
When the effects of Time on the dependent variables were considered separately, the scales for Family Pride, Vulnerability, Emotional Distance, Tension/Anger, and Global Pathology showed a significant difference at p < .05, and the Role Exaggeration scale showed borderline significance ( p = .06).
Blood eosinophil counts at 7 months of life showed only borderline significance for developing AD (p=0.06) at the same age, and blood eosinophil counts at one year of life showed no association with AD.