“borderline significant”

Although each of these metrics was positively associated with tumor burden, none of these associations were strong, with only CMC demonstrating a borderline significant association (Spearman rho = 0.203, P = 0.048).

There was a borderline significant difference between weight at surgery and OI type ( p = 0.048).

A borderline significant difference between groups was only observed for statement D.4 ( p = 0.048) that focused on the pharmacist’s assessment of the patient’s ability to understand instructions where PRISMA pharmacists, on average, ranked this slightly higher.

DUDIT Cut-off Groups Compared with the PQ-B There was a difference between the DUDIT cut-off groups on the PQ-B total score (H = 11.2; p < 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis H test), and in the post-hoc multiple comparisons, there was only a borderline significant difference between the groups: ‘below cut-off’ and ‘drug-related problems’ (z = 2.65; p = 0.048).

Our study showed a borderline significant association ( P =0.048) between AVC presence and LVEF, whereas higher AVC scores were no longer associated with LVEF, indicating that the presence of AVC may be related to LV systolic function.

The MR results by the inverse variance weighted method were not significant in all cancers except stomach cancer, which showed borderline significant results ( p = 0.0486).

As depicted in Figure 5 , a borderline significant correlation ( p = 0.049) with change in total β -cell responsivity to glucose (Δ Φ tot ) could be established for GLP-1 in the SG group, whereas no correlation could be established for GIP. 4.

The genotypic and allelic frequencies of IL-1β were not significantly associated with CCS, whereas there was a borderline significant difference in genotype distribution of CC over TT of IL-1β ( p < 0.049).

The preprocedure HV distance was 98 ± 10.55ms in the group with permanent pacemaker implantation and the mean value in the group without permanent pacemaker implantation was 66.27 ± 15.55 ms, showing a borderline significant difference (p = 0.049).

There was a borderline significant difference between the i-autism group and the i-ADHD group on the Social Awareness subscale ( p = 0.049) (see Table 3 ).

In contrast, a borderline significant difference ( p =0.049) was observed between the suture group (I) and the suture and tissue adhesive group (III) (Fig. 6 ).

Our sensitivity analyses showed very similar results, with two exceptions: first, a path from externalizing behaviour to decreases in subsequent education from around age 19 to around age 22 became borderline significant ( p = 0.049) in the fixed effects model with amended scales (Fig.

However, in the local sonic cue condition we observed a borderline significant decrease in firing rate in the center from cue-free to cue-containing sessions (0.978 ± 0.146 and 0.888 ± 0.145, respectively; Z = 1.963, P = 0.049, h 2 = 0.213).

According to our recent results, a higher concentration of RSV-specific IgG4 antibodies sampled in children at the age of one was borderline significantly positively correlated with atopic dermatitis (tau_b = 0.211, p = 0.049), and it was positively correlated with current atopic dermatitis in 10-year-old children (tau_b = 0.269, p = 0.012) ( Table 6 ).

Quality of life functional scales showed a borderline significant result for mental functioning domain was found in favor of the control group ( p = 0.049).

Other borderline significant parameters included the absence ATG in conditioning (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1–2.3; p = 0.049), patient CMV seropositive status (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1–2; p = 0.041), and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1–2.8; p = 0.044) ( Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, Supplementary Figure S9 ).

Patients with mild hypocapnia had a borderline significant association with increased in-hospital mortality (aHR 2.07; 95% CI 1.02–4.12— p = 0.049).

A borderline significant difference was found ( T = 98.50, z = −1.97, p = .049) with a more than moderate effect size of r TSSE = .35 (cf.

There was, however, a borderline significant sex difference between the two groups, with 73.0% male patients in the tirofiban group and 51.2% male patients in the control group ( P = 0.049).

Although analyses stratified by sex showed no difference for males ( F (1.81, 45.284) = 1.83, p = 0.17), a borderline significant difference was found for females ( F (3.01,168.578) = 2.67, p = 0.049).

Among women, there was a borderline significant decrease in 2020 in the age group 40–65 years (214 per 100,000; PI 215–273; p = 0.0491) (see Fig. 2 , fourth row).

Whereas female neutered dogs more often had scMCTs than cMCT (94/299, 31.4% versus 301/1241, 24.2%) male intact dogs more often had cMCTs (503/1541, 32.6% versus 84/299, 28.1%) but the difference was only borderline significant ( P = 0.0495).

Borderline significant differences in the two groups resulted also for gender ( p = 0.0495) ( Table 2 ).

When comparing the results between the younger and older adults who received the same vaccine, there were no significant differences in the number of omicron-reactive IFNγ + CD4 + and IFNγ + CD8 + T cells in response to the spike or S/M/N/E peptide pool, except for in younger adults who received CoronaVac, who showed a higher number of CD4 + IFNγ + T cells using S/M/N/E peptide pool for stimulation, which was borderline significant (p=0·0498; appendix p 17 ).

The difference in TEP levels after the second cycle of chemotherapy was borderline significant ( p = 0.0499; 52.1 ± 14.8 (20–76) vs. 81.8 ± 39.2 (34–146) ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.