Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

1,562 sentences · 1,562 papers · 13,524 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Other borderline significant parameters included the absence ATG in conditioning (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1–2.3; p = 0.049), patient CMV seropositive status (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1–2; p = 0.041), and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1–2.8; p = 0.044) ( Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, Supplementary Figure S9 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Our sensitivity analyses showed very similar results, with two exceptions: first, a path from externalizing behaviour to decreases in subsequent education from around age 19 to around age 22 became borderline significant ( p = 0.049) in the fixed effects model with amended scales (Fig.
borderline significantp=0·04981.0× alphagold
When comparing the results between the younger and older adults who received the same vaccine, there were no significant differences in the number of omicron-reactive IFNγ + CD4 + and IFNγ + CD8 + T cells in response to the spike or S/M/N/E peptide pool, except for in younger adults who received CoronaVac, who showed a higher number of CD4 + IFNγ + T cells using S/M/N/E peptide pool for stimulation, which was borderline significant (p=0·0498; appendix p 17 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
The relative risk for IBS at 16 years increased with increasing number of concurrent allergy-related diseases, but the linear trend for relative risk was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In the unadjusted comparison of outcomes between the IMN and ORIF pairs, there were no statistically significant differences, although the greater prevalence of revisions in the ORIF cohort was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).
borderline significantP = .051.0× alphagold
Individuals randomized to receive azathioprine did not see a reduction in the need for lid surgery (OR = 0.60; 95% CI .12, 3.04; P = .54); however, a borderline significant result was observed for radiotherapy (OR = 0.17; 95% CI .03, 1.03; P = .05) with the 95% CI crossing equality (Supplementary Table 3) ( 27 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).
borderline significantP = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Home O 2 use was borderline significant after adjustment for these additional variables (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.99 - 3.04, P = 0.050.) Figure 1 demonstrates a Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the home O 2 cohort with an overall mean (95% CI) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).