Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Both fledglings and recruitment models lose the significant effect of age 2 , the linear effect of age is only borderline significant (depending upon model), and importantly the parameter estimate of age is much closer to zero in the longitudinal dataset ( Tables S7 and S9 ).
Should females prefer old males?
Evol Lett · 2021 · PMC8484724
While the associations with specific pathways such as the IGF1 (p = 0.016) signature, the BRCA deficiency signature (p = 0.095) or the genomic grade index (p = 0.040) were statistically borderline significant and visually less pronounced, ( Figure S4A–C ) we could more clearly confirm the associations with TNBC subtypes published by Lehmann and colleagues despite the small number of samples (p = 0.07, 0.009 and 0.008 for mesenchymal stem cell, luminal androgen receptor and basal 1 signatures, respectively, Figure S4D–F ) [9] .
nt time × genotype interaction, with significantly higher MEP amplitudes after 1-Hz rTMS in the Val/Val group compared to the non-Val/Val group; and (3) PAS(25) for two muscles [abductor pollicis brevis (APB); abductor digiti minimi (ADM)] resulted in a significant increase of the MEPs in ADM and a borderline significant increase in APB in the Val/Val group and no significant effects in non-Val/Val individuals (Cheeran et al., 2008 ).
The difference ranged from −3.9 MJ/d (32%) on the third assessment occasion to −2.7 MJ/d (23%) on the second assessment occasion and the correlation coefficient for EI and TEE was only statistically significant on assessment occasion 4 ( ρ = 0.34, CI: 0.04, 0.58), although it was borderline significant on the first assessment occasion.
Larger sample sizes result in improved power of finding an important treatment effect when it’s there, as well as tighter CIs, and reduced publication biases when an effect is significant; but pre-experimental planning and statistical inference given a borderline significant p value are quite different things.
Bayesian interpretation of p values in clinical trials.
BMJ Evid Based Med · 2022 · PMC9510434
Another RCT in North India reported a small borderline significant beneficial effect of 1·8 μg vitamin B 12 supplementation given daily for 6 months on neurodevelopment in young children, with the most pronounced effect among children who had evidence of vitamin B 12 deficiency and who were stunted at study start ( 14 ) .
12 Of the previously published HF data from trials comparing statins to placebo or standard care, only the Heart Protection Study (HPS) demonstrated a reduction in any major HF event, namely a borderline significant reduction of 14% in the composite outcome of HF death and non-fatal HF hospitalization on simvastatin compared with placebo [354 vs. 405 first events, RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.75–1.00)]. 4 In HPS, there were also trends towards reductions in both HF death and non-fatal hospitalizations, respectively. 4 , 33 However, other trials had found no such benefit, underlining the need for a comprehensive synthesis of trial data.