“borderline significant”

The variables with significant or borderline significant associations in the multivariate model were included in the final model.

Models 5 and 6 show that supervisory position, higher salary, and received training are positively related to higher performance, while there is a borderline significant, weak association between gender and performance (males score a little lower).

Third, we have identified sphingomyelin (d18:2/16:0, d18:1/16:1) to be associated with reduced EDS as well as four sphingomyelins—highly correlated with (d18:2/16:0, d18:1/16:1)— that were borderline significant.

DISCUSSION In the present study, the GA or AA CCND1 genotype was associated with a borderline significant increase in the risk of colorectal cancer only among women.

A meta-analysis of 59 studies ( 95 ) showed a borderline significant association between iron intake and colorectal cancer (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.17) and no significant association with breast cancer or lung cancer, the latter which was supported by another recent meta-analysis ( 96 ).

This trend was borderline significant in the above sample.

The authors noticed that high LTPA reduced the risk of LTSA by a borderline significant 23%, whereas moderate LTPA also reduced LTSA but a lower percentage than high LTPA [ 31 ].

Finally, p < 0.05 was considered significant, whereas p -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered borderline significant.

This lack of effect is further supported by the significant decrease of HOMA- β and the borderline significant decrease in HOMA-S in the healthy control group.

Some of the objectively assessed environmental variables became only borderline significant, because of larger confidence intervals caused by the larger number of categories.

However, the relative risk increased and was borderline significant after adjustment [adjusted RRR = 1.20 (0.99, 1.44)].

By focusing on interactions in regions of borderline significant genetic associations, we were able to identify potentially physiologically relevant target genes of GWAS SNPs through functional rather than proximity considerations.

Multivariate analysis showed a borderline significant association between the presence of MBL lo clones and a shorter survival.

The associations for DBP VVV measures were not significant or borderline significant (Table 2 and Supplemental Table S1 ).

The findings in this animal model of an increase in cholinergic sensitivity in the absence of chronic β 2 -AR stimulation and vice versa, fit in with our observation of a combination of apparent resistance to downregulation with respect to bronchoprotection (figure 1 and table 4 ) combined with the numerative (and borderline significant) largest degree of loss of bronchodilation (figure 2 and table 5 ) within genotype I/I.

Significant differences between two groups were reported when the p-value was ≤ 0.05, and borderline significant differences between two groups were reported when the p-value was between 0.05 and 0.1.

In stratified analysis, carriage of at least one NLRP3 rs35829419 variant allele conferred a 2.5-fold increased risk for pathological interstitial lung fibrosis (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.97 to 6.14), although this association was only borderline significant.

In premenopausal women (Table 3 ), we also observed 0.37 SD lower, yet borderline significant, ESR1 expression among the highly obese (adjusted mean difference = −0.96; 95% CI: −1.97, 0.05), while ESR1 expression was 1.5 SD significantly lower among the underweight (adjusted mean difference = −3.90; 95% CI: −6.44, −1.36).

The IGHV ‐unmutated configuration was associated with a shorter PFS, that was of borderline significant probably as a consequence of the limited number of patients assessed.

In adjusted results, the association between living in Greater Glasgow and current smoking was attenuated [OR = 0.92, CI = 0.78–1.09 for men, and OR = 1.08, CI = 0.94–1.23 for women; results based on multiply imputed data to account for missing values remained borderline significant for women].

15 A P of 5×10 −8 was considered significant for the GWAS, and P <5×10 −6 was deemed borderline significant.

A positive microarray result indicating ROH showed a borderline significant negative impact on OS (Figure 2A ), while categorization of ROH in up to 25 Mb versus more than 25 Mb showed a strong and significant negative impact of ROH on both OS and AML evolution (Figure 2B,C ).

However, for men the effect is only borderline significant (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.11).

All variables with non-significant results (using a conservative p<0.1 to not miss any borderline significant predictors) were then dropped from inclusion into the multivariable logistic model.

P -values were borderline significant after Bonferroni correction.