Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, some borderline significant interaction effects became non-significant, indicating that the conclusions from the interaction analyses are exploratory and require further validation in studies with larger sample sizes. 5.
We observed that the risk of PCa in IBD patients were of borderline significant increase (pooled SIR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.95–1.22; I 2 =61.2%; Figure 2 ) when compared with the background population, as was the risk of UC subgroup (pooled SIR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93–1.33; I 2 =73.5%; Figure 2 ) and CD subgroup (pooled SIR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.93–1.20; I 2 =15.1%; Figure 2 ).
The modest, borderline significant improvement in VA in a minority of patients in this study echoes previous reports from the ongoing CHM gene therapy trials. 43 – 46 , 62 – 64 Less than 20% of the treated patients, reported thus far, have achieved only modest improvements in acuity in their treated eyes; this emphasizes that, when
After adjustment for regional center, there was significant variation by genotype in the circulating concentration of phytanic acid and borderline significant variation in circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and enterodiol, respectively, with higher levels of phytanic acid and 25-hydroxyvitamin D being observed among men with more copies of the LCT T allele and lower levels of enterodiol among carriers of the T allele.
However, when we examined the impact of these variants on endogenous mRNA and protein levels in a small panel of LCLs homozygous for the wildtype or variant alleles whilst we found a borderline significant, approximately 30%, reduction in XPC protein expression, the mRNA expression result was more difficult to interpret as, although there was a lower mean mRNA level in homozygous carriers, there was a wide interquartile range and the result was not statistically significant.
Our analyses of selected indicators of dietary intake in association with wellbeing and health behaviour parameters revealed statistically significant or borderline significant associations for saturated fat intake, dietary fibre intake, eating vegetables daily, and daily intake of fruits and vegetables ( Table 3 ).
While a borderline significant difference was detected in the frequency of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between SS-L and SS-nL patients (57.1 vs 18.4, p=value: 0.05) ( Supplementary Table 1 ), no statistically significant difference in serum Lp-PLA2 activity levels was observed between patients with high vs normal CRP serum levels (57.9 ± 20.8 vs 47.7 ± 13.8, p=value: 0.20, data not shown).