“borderline significant”

In the 1-back test, ch1 and ch2 had a borderline significant correlation with rMSSD (ch1: r = −0.304, p = 0.050; ch2: r = −0.292, p = 0.061), and the oxy-Hb concentrations of ch5 and ch6 were significantly negatively correlated with rMSSD (ch5: r = −0.350, p = 0.023; ch6: r = −0.324, p = 0.036).

However, for chlorpyrifos male farmers showed significantly higher FT4 and FT3 the day after spraying ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.047, n = 37), while for female farmers there was only a borderline significant increase for T3 ( p = 0.050, n = 14).

Excluding this study reduced I 2 to 0% in the desloratadine subgroup, where the effect became borderline significant ( p = 0.05; MD 5.04, 95% CI –0.05 to 10.12), and yielded a significant overall benefit in favor of the combination therapy with low heterogeneity ( p = 0.005; MD 6.71, 95% CI 2.03 to 11.39; I 2 = 12%).

FICB demonstrated a borderline significant increase in the risk of quadriceps weakness (RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 10.37, P = 0.05).

There was a borderline significant 1.7-fold increase in mean Errα mRNA levels (95% CI 0.99 to 2.49; p = 0.05).

Specifically, as exhibited in Figure 2 , the analyses of the three-way conditional effect ( B = 0.16; p < 0.05) showed that the interaction between role ambiguity and transformational leadership regarding job satisfaction was significant among respondents holding a position as a supervisor/manager ( B = 0.23; p < 0.001), but only borderline significant among respondents not holding a supervisor/manager position ( B = 0.07, p ≤ 0.05).

Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05, with P values for borderline significant results approaching P = 0.05 also reported.

Age showed a borderline significant link with mortality (p=0.05), suggesting a slight risk increase with age.

Gender shows a borderline significant association, with females having lower odds compared with males (odds ratios [OR] = 0.64, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.41–1.00, P = .05).

There was a borderline significant overall effect of treatment ( F 1, 1.18 = 82.59, P = 0.05).

Similarly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis for PON1 showed a borderline significant difference in survival (Log-rank test: χ 2 = 3.834, p = 0.050), indicating a possible trend towards poorer survival outcomes in patients with lower PON1 activity.

The effects of smoking on complications were similar in PTNBs performed using the core needle biopsy technique, but the association between smoking history and hemoptysis was borderline significant (current smoking, p = 0.05; heavy smoking, p = 0.06; Table S5 ).

Using the 97 th percentile as their threshold for obesity, there was a borderline significant over-transmission of 125W risk allele into obese subjects (P = 0.05).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

SBP was borderline significant for predicting adverse CV events (p = 0.05).

However, the interaction of sex with the association between log-transformed 3% ODI and CHD was only borderline significant ( p =0.05).

Although one study found age to be borderline significant in univariate analysis (p = 0.05), increasing age was ultimately included in their prediction model for fibrosis [ 31 ].

Statistically significant variables ( p < 0.05) or borderline significant variables ( p = 0.05–0.10) were assessed for collinearity and entered into a logistic regression model to assess if any of these variables were predictive of AVN or final Severin grade.

Other variables did not reach statistical significance, although the occipital fat pad was borderline significant and showed a trend toward a favourable outcome (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.99–1.83, p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

The reduced rates of non-severe hypoglycaemia with regular human insulin were only borderline significant ( p = 0.05), with no clear differences among the insulin analogues lispro, glulisine and aspart.

Still, there was a borderline significant difference between the groups vis-à-vis educational attainment ( P =0.05).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).

For upper extremity strength there was a borderline significant multivariate time effect (F 3,36 = 2.87; p = 0.050; partial Eta 2 = 0.193) with significant univariate improvement for concentric (F 1,38 = 5.41; p = 0.025; partial Eta 2 = 0.125) and eccentric (F 1,38 = 6.58; p = 0.014; partial Eta 2 = 0.148).

More frequent kennel pacing in placebo group kittens was borderline significant during the SS3 time point ( P = 0.05).