“borderline significant”

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

When adjusting for age, similar results were observed, although only borderline significant during scan 1 (scan 1: p = 0.05; scan 2: p < 0.05; scan 3: p = 0.15; scan 4: p = 0.60; scan 5: p = 0.56).

There were no significant differences in demographic variables and cognitive assessment scores between the groups, except for a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.05) in the MOCA score (Supplementary Table 1 ).

Logistic regression analysis revealed borderline significant positive association between good outcome and time at a cooling depth (35°C–36.5°C, p=0.05); adjusted for old age, the association became significant (p=0.04).

Cortisol levels were also unaffected by the affiliative relationship between wolves (LR test, χ 2 = 2.1, p = 0.14; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ), though the rank of the individual leaving did seem to have a borderline significant effect (LR test, χ 2 = 10.8 df = 5, p = 0.05; see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures ).

For RNFL thickness, the adjusted effect was borderline significant ( p ≈ 0.05).

There was a small significant association between group and gender (χ 2 (2) = 6.24, p = 0.04) and a borderline significant difference in age between groups (F [1, 593] = 3.74, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.006). 2.2.2.

The interaction between OC user status and the plasma estradiol level on 5‐HT4R BP ND was borderline significant in neocortex ( P = 0.05, not corrected for multiple comparisons), pointing to a positive association between BP ND and suppressed levels of plasma estradiol among OC users only.

5 C – H ); however, PR4 up-regulation was only borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

264 not prescribed at baseline), this difference was borderline significant (median 145 ng/ml vs. 130 ng/ml, p = 0.05).

There were no significant differences in LVEF, RVEF, native T1, native T2, extracellular volume, LV strain and myocardial scar between the COVID patients and healthy controls, although there was a borderline significant higher T1 in COVID patients (mean 1006 ± 31 ms vs 993 ± 29 ms, P = .05; Suppl.

The cascade message group had higher visit attendance than the single reminder group, although the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).

As shown in Figure 1 , the TG levels were significantly associated with HOMA‐IR ( P < 0.001), and the association of the LDL‐C/HDL‐C ratio with HOMA‐β was borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

2 , 3 ); differences were only significant for fibrous volume and borderline significant for necrotic-core volume ( P < 0.05 and P = 0.07, respectively).

Antimalarials were administered to 11 patients (58%), 73% of whom died during hospitalisation, yielding a borderline significant positive association between antimalarial administration and fatal outcome (OR 5.93, 95%CI: 0.93–50.5, Fisher's exact p-value = 0.05).

While a borderline significant association between low level laser and treatment effects was identified in studies involving myogenous TMD ( P = .05), this pattern was not consistently observed across other interventions ( Table S10 , Supplemental Digital Content 13). 3.5.

While there was no significant difference between T1 and T6 in terms of HNAS ( p = 0.18), borderline significant differences were found in NKS ( p = 0.05) scores.

Smedman and Vessby [ 15 ] reported a borderline significant (P = 0.05) reduction in the percent body fat of normal weight subjects fed CLA (4.2 g/d for 12 weeks) as compared to the placebo group.

We found borderline significant correlation between the electroneurographic quotient and hypertension ( p = 0.050).

Secondary Outcomes: Total and Aerobic Activity Times In phase I (Table 2 ), the unblinded and blinded groups were not significantly different in modifying their total activity times, whereas there was a borderline significant smaller decrease in aerobic time in unblinded patients (differential 8 minutes; 95% CI, 0 to 16; P =0.05).

Figure 4 , A, confirmed a statistically significant association between maximum Pa o 2 and death (Wald χ 2 = 8.72, df = 3, P = .033) and borderline significant nonlinearity (Wald χ 2 = 5.81, df = 2, P = .05).

In the RBVD study, and only MDA showed a borderline significant association with smoking status ( p = 0.05, Table S1 ) and a significant association with CYMA ( p < 0.01, Table S3 ), regardless of the dietary group.

This result was borderline significant ( p = 0.05), and therefore should be interpreted with caution, as it may reflect a trend rather than a definitive difference.

After adjustment, the associations between FTO and baseline BMI remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).