“borderline significant”

The comparison between ‘middle’ and ‘slower’ durations was borderline significant (Mean Difference = 4.46, t = 2.39, p = 0.05), while no significant difference was found between ‘faster’ and ‘middle’ durations (Mean Difference = 1.79, t = 1.35, p = 0.19).

We observed a borderline significant difference in its prevalence between women and men (11% vs. 2%, P = 0.05).

In the Gem treated group of patients, TNM stage and DPD expression levels were both independent parameters for survival (with P=0.018 and P=0.036, respectively), whereas sex was borderline significant (P=0.050, Table III ).

The interaction was borderline significant, F (4,84) = 2.43, p = 0.05.

There is also a borderline significant inter- action between birthweight and age at menarche (P = 0.05), with a stronger effect of birthweight in girls with earlier puberty.

Ablation application number A pooled analysis of 8 studies including 4149 patients (1688 ZF/MF; 2461 CF) revealed a borderline significant reduction in applications with ZF/MF (MD −0.80 [−1.59 to −0.01]; P = .050; I 2 = 46.4%) ( Supplemental Figure 12 ).

The cost contribution attribute was again not significant for the parent sample but was borderline significant for the child sample, who showed preference for lower cost contribution ( β -coefficient = −0.0095 [ P = 0.050; 95 % bootstrapped CI = −0.013 to −0.009]).

Coronary artery disease was borderline significant as a determinant of renal dysfunction (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.82, p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

The difference in neuron/neurotransmission score between the Sham and NRL groups was borderline significant (−0.4 ± 1.5 vs −4.0 ± 0.9, p = 0.050).

The standardized indirect effects for the MUSIC constructs on achievement were statistically significant for success ( p < 0.01) and interest ( p < 0.05), and borderline significant for caring ( p = 0.05), with the following values: 0.008 for empowerment ( p = 0.370), 0.010 for usefulness ( p = 0.184), 0.064 for success ( p = 0.006), 0.028 for interest ( p = 0.016), and − 0.016 for caring ( p = 0.050).

Nevertheless, High-MetF individuals had higher diastolic blood pressure, a larger drop in TG concentration during the OGTT, and a borderline significant (P = 0.05) higher Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT).

The analysis for item P3 was borderline significant, p = 0.05.

However, the GLM was only borderline significant for rubber tires ( Z = − 1.97, P = 0.05) but not plastic containers ( Z = − 0.80, P = 0.42) when analyzed separately.

A Friedman test shows a borderline significant difference in pressure pain thresholds between the groups ( p = 0.050).When groups are tested pairwise with a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, statistically significant differences can be found.

In the analysis of SIDS subsets with and without single ectopic granule cells in the molecular layer of the DG ( Table 9 ), there was a borderline significant difference in PCA ( p = 0.05) and the face position (face down or face covered) ( p = 0.09).

Results There were no differences at baseline in anthropometrics or body composition between the intervention and control group, with BMI reaching a borderline significant higher value in the intervention group ( P = .05) ( Table 1 ).

This non‐physiological correlation was the strongest for sCA estimates in the posterior circulation (VA; r = 0.44; P = 0.03) and borderline significant for the anterior circulation (ICA; r = 0.40; P = 0.05).

PRDX1 protein expression correlated with smaller tumor size ( P = 0.011), low tumor grade ( P = 0.002), negative Ki67 status ( P = 0.004) and lobular subtype ( P = 0.003), whilst there was a borderline significant correlation with positive ER status ( P = 0.05).

A borderline significant positive association between MLR and AST was observed in the combined cohort (r = 0.188, p = 0.050).

[ 29 ] suggested using high-frequency ultrasound to assess tumor depth; however, they found a borderline significant correlation between ultrasound-determined and punch biopsy-determined depth for superficial lesions ( p = 0.05007), but no correlation for nodular lesions.

The differences were borderline significant in convalescence period ( p = 0.0501) and there were statistically significant differences in stabilizing period ( p = 0.0318).

While the difference in post-prandial blood glucose (PPBG) at three months was borderline significant (p = 0.0501), it became clearly significant by six months (p = 0.027).

This protective effect was then observed at week 12, as well as weeks 16, 18 and 20, while at weeks 14 and 21, the results were borderline significant ( p = 0.0501 and p = 0.052, respectively).

231 A large pre-diagnostic plasma ENL levels and breast cancer prognosis among Danish post-menopausal women study evidence interesting results in crude models higher ENL levels were associated with lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality but after adjustment for lifestyle factors this association was only borderline significant ( P = 0.0501).

This was because, when ON medication, patients were motivated by contingency but not reward expectation (separate two-way ANOVA in PD ON: contingency*motivation, p=0.0170; see Supplementary file 1A ), whereas after overnight withdrawal of medication there was a borderline significant interaction in the opposite direction, as PD OFF were motivated by reward expectation but not contingency (PD OFF ANOVA: p=0.0501; Supplementary file 1A ).