“borderline significant”

The prevalence of falls was higher in those belonging to lower and extreme poor socioeconomic group, however, it was borderline significant (p = 0.051).

Also, a borderline significant difference showed less patients with MACS-positive profile in group UT versus BT (24.45% versus 36.59%, p = 0.051).

While a higher BMI (OR: 0.832, p = 0.017) and ferritin (OR: 1.022, p = 0.031) levels independently predicted GDM, the predictive value of ferritin was borderline significant when combined with glucose tests (area under the curve = 0.689, p = 0.051).

3.4 L1CAM affects prognosis through its effect on platinum resistance In multivariate survival analysis, adjusted for age, FIGO stage and tumour grade, L1CAM IHC showed a significant association with DSS (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12‐3.66, P = .019) and a borderline significant effect on PFS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.00‐2.56, P = .051); these results confirm L1CAM as an independent adverse prognostic factor (Figure 3A‐C ).

30.3±4.4 frames, p=0.044) and borderline significant by epicardial lumen diameters (3.3±0.8 mm vs. 4.1±1.0 mm, p=0.051) and greater myocardial mass (92.8±12.6 g/m 2 vs. 82.9±8.6 g/m 2 , p=0.054).

However, light fruits were borderline significant in linear regression ( p = 0.051), we can’t conclude from our findings that there are real differences between light fruits and sleep quality.

Kidney survival curves were not significantly different between c.731T>C and c.508G>A homozygotes but were borderline significant when comparing c.731T>C to c.454T>A homozygotes ( P = 0.051).

Moreover, a borderline significant association between MPV/PCT ratio and patient age at the diagnosis was also found ( P =0.051).

the positive treatment effect slightly increased over time); however, it was only borderline significant ( P = 0.051, Appendix Figure 6, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A365 ).

While 9,882 persons (4.41%) a borderline significant effect of higher education did remain (3rd tertile: HR = 0.94, p = 0.051), the effect of long-term unemployment was attenuated once adjusted for average household income.

The 3-year DFS was 91.7% in the alectinib group and 60.7% in the ChT group, albeit with a borderline significant benefit in DFS (HR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02–1.28, p = 0.051), most likely due to the small sample size.

No statistically significant difference was observed in VD parameters of the SCP and DCP ( P = 0.102–0.894); only a borderline significant decrease was found in the temporal SCP VD ( P = 0.051) in the post-COVID group.

The increase in self-esteem was borderline significant from Start to End ( p = .051).

The exceptions were the significant difference concerning abdominal obesity (31/76 [40.8%] vs 7/38 [18.4%], χ 2 = 5.7, P = 0.017, OR = 3.05 [95% CI 1.2–7.8]) and the borderline significant difference concerning reduced HDL (9/76 [11.8%] vs 10/38 [26.3%], χ 2 = 3.8, P = 0.051, OR = 0.38 [95% CI 0.14–1.0]) [not shown].

There was weak, borderline significant association between higher ERP standardisation and clinician adherence and lower mortality rates ( r = -–0.219, p = 0.051).

Differences were statistically significant for total SCFAs ( p = 0.028), in line with the correlation results, as well as for acetate ( p = 0.041) and propionate ( p = 0.028), and borderline significant in the case of butyrate ( p = 0.051), isobutyrate ( p = 0.084), and isovalerate ( p = 0.090) ( Figure 8 ).

However, we observed borderline significant higher IL-17C levels in patients with CVD when PASI ≤ 10 (3.27 vs. 2.82, p = 0.051, Figure 5 , lower right). 3.

Furthermore, using a paired t -test, we found a significant increase in pesticide safety practices ( p < 0.05) in the intervention group and a borderline significant increase regarding in-home safety ( p = 0.051) in the control group.

Maternal disability again showed a sizeable positive association with birth weight ( β = 0.451, p = 0.056), while marital status also became borderline significant ( β = 0.112, p = 0.051), suggesting that formal unions may offer social or financial stability beneficial to late-gestation development.

Latencies The latency of the wave in ring 1 mfERG in the affected eye was statistically significantly longer than the control eye after three months ( p = 0.011), while in rings 3 and 4, borderline significant, or significantly longer, latencies were observed in the affected eye at the first examination (ring 3 p = 0.051; ring 4 p = 0.044), and in rings 2 and 5 there was no significant difference in latencies between the affected and control eyes throughout the observed examinations ( Figure 4 ).

Regarding heterogeneity ( Table S6 ), type of respiratory infection emerged as borderline significant (p = 0.051, Figure S7 ) with a stronger pooled effect size seen for pneumonia (pooled RR = 4.15, 95% CI = 3.42–5.04) compared to studies that grouped influenza and pneumonia together (pooled RR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.95–3.96).

In the final Model B, after further adjustment for sex and age, the association with a higher BMI became borderline significant (aOR = 1.078; 95% CI: 1.000–1.162; P = 0.051), whereas the association with lower total cholesterol levels remained significant (aOR = 0.819; 95% CI: 0.684–0.981; P = 0.030).

However, there was a borderline significant effect of sex on NA: F (1,52) = 3.99, p = 0.051 with a mean of 17.1 (95% CI: 13.9–20.3) in males and 13.1 (95% CI: 10.8–15.5) in females.

When patients were subgrouped by SIG, a borderline significant association was seen in the SIG 0 cohort—80%/81%/77%/46% ( P = 0.051) of patients for TNM I/II/III/IV disease, respectively.

12/65 (18.5%)], although the difference was only borderline significant (p = 0.051).