Plots suggested modest skew but the Cook–Weisberg test was clearly significant ( p < .001).
← all phrases
“clearly significant”
In the literature
When the participant was stimulated non-invasively, the presence of clearly significant Distance × Group interaction ( amputee stimulated non-invasively vs Control ) [ F (1,5077) = 28.379, p < 0.001] suggests that the participant behaved differently from the control healthy group.
Results: The tests of significance showed that the effects of sex, age, waist circumference, family history obesity and frequency of breakfast days were clearly significant ( P < 0.001).
Confirming the MS data, T cells had intracellular levels of C3, and confirming the translocation observed in the MS data, the quantitative data from the images of C3 staining showed slightly higher C3 abundance in the nucleus compared to the cytosol upon TCR stimulation which was clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2D ).
The Pearson correlation coefficients for the association between age and the three objective memory tests were clearly significant (LM r = − 0.39, Voc r = −.049 and LNS r = −.041; all p < 0.001).
We observed a clearly significant difference among ALN status in patients with Her-2 positive (P = 0.001) and Luminal B (P < 0.0001) breast cancer.
Reversing the causal ordering (hs-CRP → index → CircS) changed the picture: both the CHG index and METS-IR produced clearly significant indirect effects (both ACME P < 0.001), pointing toward a model in which systemic inflammation feeds into CircS risk partly by perturbing atherogenic lipid handling and insulin homeostasis.
Six-month-old infants had clearly significant preferences for the top halves of cat faces, t (56) = 5.09, p < 0.001, d = 0.67, and monkey faces, t (56) = 5.10, p < 0.001, d = 0.68.
While the upregulation of Daf-21 up_2 is slightly weaker in the first experiment (UpRegScore of 70, 97 and 97, respectively), it is still clearly significant when compared to 100 random gene sets (UpRegScore: 3.7 ± 6.2, p<0.001) ( Fig 3A ).
Table 1 depicts the results of an analysis of consanguinity among all participants, indicating similar results to those for first-degree cousins, with a P value close to statistical significance for malformations ( P =.067) and a clearly significant association with CHD ( P =.003).
Moreover, accounting for effects explainable by those on generic psychopathology reduced the magnitude of the pre- and postnatal anxiety by stroking interaction effect on irritability by just 12%, and with improved precision this interaction effect on irritability remained clearly significant (p = 0.003).
For all three conditions, the decline in looking time across the four encoding trials was clearly significant (Storyline Condition: F [3, 102] = 4.66, p = 0.004, partial Eta-Squared = 0.121; Pixelized Condition: F [3, 72] = 19.04, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.442; Scrambled Condition: F [3, 102] = 25.74, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.431).
Secondary outcomes A clearly significant time x group interaction was found for the FERUS, resulting in an F -value of F (1,44) = 9.04, p = 0.004.
In this context, the mScarlet-based biosensor showed minimal response (0.3 ± 0.2%, n = 11), whereas the stagRFP counterpart showed a clearly significant FRET response (3.3 ± 0.4%, n = 8, p = 0.005, t = 3.642, df = 9) (Fig. 3a ).
In our study, the presence of blood or mucus in stool or abdominal cramps are clearly significant predictors (p < 0.005) of true E . histolytica infections in case Entamoeba histolytica/dispar cysts or trophozoites were found on microscopy.
The results were clearly significant ( F = 4.057, p = 0.006), indicating that there were significant differences in expression between the groups.
However, after controlling for UPDRS III this difference became clearly significant ( p = 0.008), indicating that for a comparable degree of motor severity, ICD+ patients were taking higher LEDD.
After conditioning with BzATP, a clearly significant increase in IL-6 expression was detected in both the control group ( p < 0.01) and in untreated MS patients ( p < 0.001).
However, 4MOSC1 tumors from mice treated with anti-PD-1 showed clearly significant higher CD8 infiltration ( p < 0.01) compared with tumors from untreated mice by FACS analysis of TILs and by immune fluorescence analysis of treated tissues (Fig. 3c, d , respectively).
Time to maximum grip velocity: A clearly significant decreasing trend was observed for the data series collected before the TMS ( C = .72; p < .01).
There was a clearly significant positive correlation for the CSD model (R 2 = =0.83; p = 0.012; Fig 1 H), while there was only a non-significant trend of a positive correlation for the DT model (R 2 = =0.65, p = 0.052; Fig 1 E).
However since the decrease of water loss post PMHA was clearly significant (P = .012), and participants served as their own controls, a confounding influence of hydration status is regarded as relatively unlikely.
faecalis at the end of the experiment were subjected to a Kruskal–Wallis analysis to confirm the higher presence in the butter-fed group of mice, and the difference was clearly significant ( p = 0.014), with post-hoc pairwise comparisons showing significance between BT and SD ( p = 0.025).
orientalis , the sex ratio in LTs was 1.4:1, which did not show any significant difference between sexes (Mann Whitney U-test, P>0.05) as opposed to a very high ratio of male to female (15.3:1) in the STs that was clearly significant (P = 0.014).
Only the induction of COR6.6 was almost significant ( p < 0.058) under normal growth conditions and was clearly significant under salinity stress conditions ( p < 0.016).