“clearly significant”

In our study, the presence of blood or mucus in stool or abdominal cramps are clearly significant predictors (p < 0.005) of true E . histolytica infections in case Entamoeba histolytica/dispar cysts or trophozoites were found on microscopy.

In this context, the mScarlet-based biosensor showed minimal response (0.3 ± 0.2%, n = 11), whereas the stagRFP counterpart showed a clearly significant FRET response (3.3 ± 0.4%, n = 8, p = 0.005, t = 3.642, df = 9) (Fig. 3a ).

Regarding Hematocrit (percentage volume occupied by red blood cells in relation to total blood volume) through analysis with ANOVA, the Genotype effect was clearly significant (F[1,16] = 9.8; p = 0.006): in WT group there was a positive percentage variation (+4.91% ± 4.29) compared to DATHET group, which showed a negative percentage variation (−8.88% ± 2.52).

The results were clearly significant ( F = 4.057, p = 0.006), indicating that there were significant differences in expression between the groups.

However, after controlling for UPDRS III this difference became clearly significant ( p = 0.008), indicating that for a comparable degree of motor severity, ICD+ patients were taking higher LEDD.

Time to maximum grip velocity: A clearly significant decreasing trend was observed for the data series collected before the TMS ( C = .72; p < .01).

However, 4MOSC1 tumors from mice treated with anti-PD-1 showed clearly significant higher CD8 infiltration ( p < 0.01) compared with tumors from untreated mice by FACS analysis of TILs and by immune fluorescence analysis of treated tissues (Fig. 3c, d , respectively).

After conditioning with BzATP, a clearly significant increase in IL-6 expression was detected in both the control group ( p < 0.01) and in untreated MS patients ( p < 0.001).

However since the decrease of water loss post PMHA was clearly significant (P = .012), and participants served as their own controls, a confounding influence of hydration status is regarded as relatively unlikely.

There was a clearly significant positive correlation for the CSD model (R 2 = =0.83; p = 0.012; Fig 1 H), while there was only a non-significant trend of a positive correlation for the DT model (R 2 = =0.65, p = 0.052; Fig 1 E).

orientalis , the sex ratio in LTs was 1.4:1, which did not show any significant difference between sexes (Mann Whitney U-test, P>0.05) as opposed to a very high ratio of male to female (15.3:1) in the STs that was clearly significant (P = 0.014).

faecalis at the end of the experiment were subjected to a Kruskal–Wallis analysis to confirm the higher presence in the butter-fed group of mice, and the difference was clearly significant ( p = 0.014), with post-hoc pairwise comparisons showing significance between BT and SD ( p = 0.025).

Only the induction of COR6.6 was almost significant ( p < 0.058) under normal growth conditions and was clearly significant under salinity stress conditions ( p < 0.016).

Differences were clearly significant between groups GBOPT and GCC ( p = 0.018, Chi 2 test) but not between groups GS and GCC ( p = 0.215, Chi 2 test), or between groups GS and GBOPT ( p = 0.260, Chi 2 test).

For example, spark logFDHM, which has an ICC of just 8.5%, changed its result from being clearly significant with the common analysis ( P = 0.023), to being not at all significant ( P = 0.778) with the hierarchical analysis.

In this study, there was a near-significant difference ( U = −1.93, p = 0.054) in gender and the attitude score and a clearly significant difference ( U = −2.25, p = 0.024) when comparing attitude categories.

The mean AUCs of each compound might be higher in responding tumors ( Figure 4 C) and clearly significant for the mean AUC of D1 rapamycin ( p = 0.03).

The increased risk for recurrent stroke and all vascular events in the top tertile remained clearly significant after additional adjustment for age, sex, BMI, HDL-C, TG, FBS, smoking, and statin use ( p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively, Table 3 ).

When restricting the analysis to patients who developed pneumomediastinum during noninvasive ventilation, the difference became clearly significant (0.17/1000 vs 1.36/1000 patient-days, p = 0.039).

Expression level of HKGs in 2nd bud showed in Figure 6 and Figure 7 was significantly ( p < 0.05) decreased gradually after one and two days treated of bare roots condition which showed lower vitality of buds, and clearly significant ( p < 0.05) decreased after three-days of treatment which exposed lower survival of the seedlings.

Furthermore, a comparison of the phylogenetic and functional genetic distances between test isolates showed a clearly significant (p < 0.05) relationship.

However, in the case of EC-MT-EM, the area showed a comparable behavior, but the overall circularity was significantly lower than EC-MT-CM ( p = 0.000), and these differences were clearly significant from 1 to 28 days of EVD ( p < 0.05, Figure 2 ), confirming the microscopic findings described above.

There were clearly significant differences between the Hsp70-overexpressing adenovirus and negative control groups ( F = 3400.31, ∗∗ P < 0.05).

Although iron did not show a clearly significant association with depressive symptoms ( p = 0.050), a significant inverse correlation of iron intake in the highest quartile versus lowest quartile was observed with an OR (95%) of 0.484 (0.279–0.841). 4.

For men, two-way ANOVA analysis did not show clearly significant results between PRE and POST salivary OXT level, in either the “social positive” vs “social negative” sample [ F (1, 7) = 5.564, p = 0.051] ( Supplementary Figure S5B ), or in the “social positive” vs “non-social” sample [ F (1, 21) = 0.029, p = 0.865] ( Supplementary Figure S5D ).