Barely Significant
← all phrases

clearly significant

481 sentences · 481 papers · 1,799 search hits before verification

In the literature

clearly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualified
Expression level of HKGs in 2nd bud showed in Figure 6 and Figure 7 was significantly ( p < 0.05) decreased gradually after one and two days treated of bare roots condition which showed lower vitality of buds, and clearly significant ( p < 0.05) decreased after three-days of treatment which exposed lower survival of the seedlings.
clearly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualified
However, in the case of EC-MT-EM, the area showed a comparable behavior, but the overall circularity was significantly lower than EC-MT-CM ( p = 0.000), and these differences were clearly significant from 1 to 28 days of EVD ( p < 0.05, Figure 2 ), confirming the microscopic findings described above.
clearly significantp = 0.0511.0× alphaqualified
For men, two-way ANOVA analysis did not show clearly significant results between PRE and POST salivary OXT level, in either the “social positive” vs “social negative” sample [ F (1, 7) = 5.564, p = 0.051] ( Supplementary Figure S5B ), or in the “social positive” vs “non-social” sample [ F (1, 21) = 0.029, p = 0.865] ( Supplementary Figure S5D ).
Disadvantages: Thrombosis of the shunt due to its size Subclavian or the innominate artery have to be sacrificed although it did not appear to have a clearly significant clinical effect[ 10 ] Extensive dissection[ 10 ] Significant arm ischemia from subclavian artery division was uncommon, although the pulse in the ipsilateral arm was often not felt for days after the operation Neurologic disadvantages are rare and include risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, phrenic nerve injury, and Horner syndrome Various modifications of systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt have been described.
The blalock and taussig shunt revisited.
Ann Card Anaesth · 2017 · PMC5535574
Interestingly, the whole brain volume (which is strongly correlated with both FP and DLPFC) seems to show an intermediate tendency: even if the effect of population density appears smaller than that of daily traveled distance (beta weight is one order of magnitude smaller), it is clearly significant, and the ‘leave-one-out’ procedure indicated that it was only slightly less reliable than daily traveled distance, with a significant decrease in model fit quality for four vs one combination of species.
As was incorporated mathematically into the statistical modeling, it was expected that those choosing to terminate participation prior to completion of the full trial would more commonly be those for whom response to prazosin was either clearly significant or clearly minimal—while those who elected to continue for the entire trial would more commonly be those for whom it remained unclear to both participant and researchers alike whether the participant had had a significant, specific positive response to treatment or not.
More importantly, PFO closure was associated with a significant reduction of the risk of stroke recurrence in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, whereas when only the 2 trials that used disc occluder devices were included, recurrent stroke risk reduction proved clearly significant and more pronounced.