Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

a strong trendp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0781.6× alphaplainly factual
Middle cerebral artery M2 locations demonstrated a strong trend favoring endovascular coiling that did not reach statistical significance (WR = 2.50, 95% CI: 0.97–6.44, p = 0.078), likely due to limited sample size.
Relationship self-report craving and skin conductance level during the cue-reactivity paradigm In the smoker cohort, a positive trend was observed between the self-reported craving score and the skin conductance level ( R = 0.18, p = 0.078 ), although it did not reach statistical significance.
Subgroup analysis of the prognostic value of RBP4 based on treatment regimens in psoriasis patients Subgroup analysis revealed that RBP4 at baseline showed a decreasing trend in patients receiving MTX ( P = 0.078) and TNF inhibitor ( P = 0.084) who achieved PASI 75 at W12 compared to those who did not achieve it, but it did not reach statistical significance.
Analysis of cells with a natural Treg cell phenotype (CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + ) in these 8 patients revealed less variability (median=2.42; range, 1.91%–3.46% of total PBMCs); however, there was a slight trend toward increasing percentages of natural Treg cell after 1 series of therapy (median=3.05; P =0.078), although these results did not reach statistical significance ( Fig. 3 ).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0791.6× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendP = 0.0791.6× alpha
The time between diagnoses showed a trend for positive correlation with cancer-associated mut/Mb that did not reach statistical significance (Spearman’s rho 0.550, P = 0.079), and a corresponding sub-analysis of non-silent mutations showed a similar result (Spearman’s rho 0.495, P = 0.121).
The odds of nonpublication showed a trend towards significance for phase III/IV trials (including trials registered for both phase II and III), and these trials were 3.1 times more likely to be published ( P =.08, OR=3.112, 95% CI: 0.876-11.054); however, the trend did not reach statistical significance.