Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

Of five cell lines tested (IGROV1 cells did not form spheroids at all), we observed significantly increased numbers of spheroids in the SP fraction of four models (i.e., A2780, A2780V, B16/92, B17/92), whereas in the fifth cell line (i.e., B2/92) we could only detect a slight trend that did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 3C + 3D).
64 – 66 One such study showed a trend toward improvement in insulin sensitivity after CPAP therapy using the hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp; however, the degree of improvement did not reach statistical significance. 67 It is possible that the failure to obtain a statistically significant result was because mean nightly usage of CPAP in that study was only 3.6 hours.
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0791.6× alphaplainly factual
Recently, one study found that the presence of NAFLD showed a favorable trend on survival rates in CRC patients, although the data did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.079), perhaps in part due to the small number of patients (227 patients) and poor statistical power. 20 Therefore, we aimed to design a large and more statistically robust cohort study to investigate the impact of NAFLD on the prognosis of patients with CRC.
Sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding The difference-in-difference analysis showed a trend towards more emergency admissions among intervention patients than controls, but the effect size was smaller than in the primary analysis and did not reach statistical significance (difference 0.10 admissions per head, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.26, p=0.220) (see online supplementary table S1 and figures S1 and S2).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061.2× alphaplainly factual
During the three months follow-up, there was a notable trend of lower mortality in patients who received a cementless THA (8.8%) compared to the cemented group (16.5%), but it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06).
The patients tested on the binocular rivalry task showed a pattern of percept duration distributions that was similar to their performance on the SFM task ( figure 5 c ), and the mean percept durations for all three bistable stimuli showed a trend towards being correlated with each other, although this did not reach statistical significance (rotating sphere-binocular rivalry, r = 0.61; rotating sphere-dot quartet, r = 0.13; figure 5 d ).