Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

However, when the different knee regions were analyzed separately, the adjusted p-values did not reach statistical significance, although a clear trend was observed, suggesting that cartilage damage may be more pronounced in the medial femorotibial joint (MFTJ), whereas bone marrow lesions appear to predominate in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) (Table 3 ).
The HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.03; stratified log-rank P = 0.057) indicated a favorable trend toward improved survival with vebreltinib, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig.
When we look at the composite outcomes (including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ventricular arrhythmia), colchicine demonstrated a favorable trend however the observed effect did not reach statistical significance after PSM.
In the subsequent years, a segment with a decreasing trend was identified during 2007–2017 with an APC of -10.6 (95% CI, -13.6 - -7.6; p = < 0.001) and another segment with an increasing trend during 2017–2021 with an APC of 7.2 (95% CI, -6.2–22.5), although the latter did not reach statistical significance as indicated by the confidence interval.
Overall, survival analyses showed a trend toward better OS for HPV-positive (67% survival) compared to HPV-negative (27% survival) patients but that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.12), most probably due to the small number of HPV-positive cases ( Figure 4 A). 2.3. p16Ink4a Protein Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining In view of the small number of HPV-positive HNSCC patients found in this cohort, and the limited amount of pathological materials available, a subset of 50 representative specimens were processed for p16 protein IHC staining.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0821.6× alphaplainly factual
There was a positive trend when we analyzed the correlation between grading and sEGFR levels; patients who presented with a G3-NSCLC had lower values of sEGFR (47.5 ng/mL) as compared to patients with G1/G2-NSCLC (56.2 and 54.2 ng/mL), although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.082).
In the MD + RS750 group, the thickness of the CA2 region improved significantly (CA2: p < 0.05), and the thicknesses of the CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus regions showed a trend toward improvement; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.1 each).